Mohankumar vs Sreena @ Raji

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 06, 2019

~8 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1881901

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1881901
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice a.Muhamed Mustaque,Honourable Mrs. Justice Sophy Thomas
Decided On: Dec 06, 2019
Case Number: Mat.Appeal/206/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohankumar

Respondent

Sreena @ Raji

Excerpt

.....agreement will form part of the judgment. sd/- a.muhamed mustaque, judge sd/- sophy thomas, judge asbefore the hon'ble high court of kerala at ernakulam mat appeal nos. 1360/2017 & 1459/20±z & mat appeal nose 25 & 206 of 2018_ sreena @ raji mohan : appellant vs. mohan kumar : respondent rl _mediatedsettlementa_greeme_n_i (under section 89 of the code of civi. procedure read with rule23 of the civil procedure (adr) rules, 2008) the parties have agreed to settle the disputes on the following terms and conditions;1. the respondent mohan kumar owns 1 acre and 89 cents as registered holding and 21 cents as excess land in his possession in survey nos.822/1/55/2, rl 822/1/55/1/4, 822/1/56/1, 822/1/56/2 in thinkalkarikkam village in punalur taluk. the respondent mohan kumar agrees to part with 1 acre 85 cents of property in his possession in favour of his wife sreena @ raji mohan and his two children jinjitha mohan and jitha mohan. •&d&vvi concil.iation centre ketalastatemedia"# h`gh court of kerala koch.i -682 031 -2-2. mohan kumar had prepared a draft deed and sketch ofthe entire property mentioned above. the parties had agreed to partition the above mentioned property in the same manner as reflected in the draft deed and in the sketch prepared. the draft deed and the sketch prepared, signed by all the parties concerned are appended herewith as annexure 1 and 2 to this agreement.a 3. the parties agree to execute the draft deed within one month in the kulathupuzha s.r.o, within a period of 30 days from the date of agreement and therespondent mohan kumar shall bear the expenses for registration of the deeds in favour of the children and the appellant sreena @ raji mohan shall bear the expenses for registration of the deed in her name, as per the draft appended herewith.4. mohan kumar and sreena @ raji mohan agrees to file a ajoint petition for divorce under sec 13 8.....

Full Judgment

IN I_tIT_. EEC-E C.OT.TP.I OF REP+lzI AT =B_N.AIqTLTA_M PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.hfl JERED XPSTAQUE £ TEE. E!ONOT,TP.ZLBLE. ELSE , JT,TSTICE SOPE!Y TEOM?.S MonDAr, THE i3TH DAy OF DEcrm ER 2o21 / 22ND AGRAHAxun, 1943
EE±T.APPEAI. NO. 1360 0F 2QIL± zical NST THE euD®rmlT DATED 28.og.2ol7 IN op 7o3/2oo6 oF F.A_l£II=Y COT,TB.I , HOTT.ZLJRA_FTJLt}_ZL. APPEIIIANT/PETITIONER+ SREERA @ RAJI MOIIAN, ficaD 44 yEziRs, D/a.Rae ENDRAN, PUTHEN puRAyll] EIOusE, ARAC:EIAli , ARAC:IAII RARE, AYIRENAI.IiooR VILIAGE , PATELZDl:APURAM TAI.UK. BY ADVS . SRI . M . I . SURESHKURAR SRI . A . Eusl TE RESPONDENT/RESPONDEFqu ro EEN RIRmR, Ae ED 42 yELp`s, s/O.Dlv ARARAN, PUTHEN VEEDU, YER00R MURI, YEROOR VIIIIAGE, pATHENApuRae4 TAI,uK -689695. THls mTRlro NIAI, App EAI, Hj IVING BEmi FINAI.I,y HEae ON

13.12.2021, ALONG WITH RAT.APPEAI- NOA.25/2018 AND 206/2018 AND Co RECTED CzisEs, TEE cou RT oN TEE sAaq DAY DELlv ERED THE ro LI,OUNG : RALg ELZL.t>pELn± Nos.1360 § 1459 of 2017 € 25 § 206 ef _ap

IN TEE. HIC-H COT.TEap OF REP_hill. .zi.I I.t2NZLTrm.z" PRESENT THE E[ONOu RABLE MR. 4usTlcE A.MulIArm ros TAQUE € TEE E!ONOTjp_z LLBI=E BG..s. ,.iT,T-sTIc:E -sop!!¥ THo.in.-s rmDAy, TEE i3TH DAy OF DEcrm ER 2o2i / 22ND AGRAHAy ENA, ig43 ±g LT.Appml, NO. 25 OF 2ol£ Acal NST THE ORDER IN Op 7o3/2oo6 OF E"II.I conT, HOTTARIAPPEIILENT/RESPOw DEE roEBuwH~ S,/O. IAT= DI`n~YJELt>LEN, AC-ED 53 YEEAP`S , PTJTEELN V=ED`-', ¥ERcoR MURI , rErooR vl LIAGE , PATHENApuRlur TELUK. By ADv MomN KURAR (pARTy IN pERs ON) iispoe!D.=N!,/pETITIo±!=_E+ SREENA @ RATI MORN, I)/o.RA-ENDRAN, purrm] pu RA¥II., ARcml., anc HEL Krm, AYIRANALI.OOR VIIil AGE , PATENAPURAM-689 695. BY .aDi DV-S . SRI . M . I . suRESHKumR SRI . R . ENFITH THls RATRIENIAI] AEipmL HAVING cobE up ron rmlsslon On

13.12.2o2i, AIjoNc- WITE RAT.£LBp=alj.i360,/2oi7 AND CORT.c:TED casEs, THE count ON THE SAME DAy DEI,IVERED THE FOLLcwl NG: EEa±_..LOp EAL NOs.i36O a 1459 Of 2Oi7 6 25 a 206 Of L2Qre

IN TEE Etl GH COUP.I OF ICE.t}_|IL|. .1.I tp.T2Nrm TT.|M PRESENT TEE E[ONOu RABI,E MR. .usTlcE A.bft]Hj RED nos TAQUE £ TE!E. E!ONOT,Tp_zBiB|.E aa.-s. ¥Th.T-STICE sopEy TE!om.-s MONDAr, THE i3TH DAY oF DECREER 2o21 / 22ND AGEunr ENA, 1943 ±aT.App EAI, NO. 206 OF 20_ii=& Aenl NST THE OuDen ENT IN Op.ro.251/2oo7 OF F"II.I ccrmT, HOTTARAKErm ±PPEIILENT/RESPONI)ENT_:_ roHENREMZLRj s/O. RATE DIVARARANj ac]=D -537 PT.TTE!EN VEEI)I.I , YES.OOF. MT.TB,I , YEB.OOF, VILLAC-E , PATHANAPURAM TAliuK. 8¥ ADv iromN K(DnR (p ART¥ IN pERsoN) R=spcneE±!T/p=TITIO±!=R: SREENA @ RATI MOELEN, D/O. RAe ENDRAN, PUTREN puRAy II,, jLRcml,, anc EL RARA, AYIRANAIII.00R VIIIIAGE , PJITHENAPu REN-691306. JIM.TITIA ±aoEz±N D/0. SREENA AND ro HEN KURAR, ARCHEL, ARCELEL Ham, Ayl RENAI,I.OOR vll,LACE , pATHENApuRm4-6913o6.

Tlrm MOELEN D/a. SFi=-EN.1. .a_t!D roELZL_ng !tT.in_T2., .zL_t2.cELa|. , .A_t!.cELhi. ![_a_t2_a., AYIRENALL00R VII.ILZIGE , PATHANAPURAM-691306. BY ADV SRI.SEREI dos EPH THCIAS TE!I.s .in.TB.nae NI.ILL. .zLLpp ELZL± EA.VING BE.EN FIN.AI.Ly EELZL_t2[> ON 13.12.2021, AI.ONG wl TH rmT.App RAL.1360/2017 END cow ECTED CASES, TE[E COURT 0N TE[E SARE DAY DELIVEREI) TEE FOLLOwl NG: rm LELAPPEAL Nos.1360 & 1459 of 2017 a 25 6 2o6 of± IN THE E[IGH cOu RT OF RERALA AT I AKurm PRESENT TEE HONou RABLE MR. ,JusTlcE A.mJm RED xpsTn QUE € TtlE HONOu RABLE MRs. 4usTlcE sopHy THorns roNDAy, THE i3TH DAy OF DEcrm ER 2o2i / 22ND AGRAHAyrm, 1943 Bg±T.APPEAI. NO.___1459 0F 20|J ficalN-sT THE el]DGRENT DziT=D 28.og.2ol7 IN op 251/2oo7 oF FAMII.Y COURT , KOTTARAREARA APPEI.RANTS/E'ETITI0NERLg+ SREENA @ RArl ro EEN, AGED 44 yEAEs, D/a RALJENDRAN, PUTHEN PURAYIL, J"CEL, ARAcml. RARE, Ayl RARALI,oon vll,ILZLGE , PATHANAPURAM TAliuK. 4INITHA Mc}HEN, AGED 22 irmRs, D/o SREERA iromN RInmR, p{]THEN RI]RA¥IIi, ARACHAI, , ARACIAL RARE, AYIENELlicoR VIIi IAGE , PATELENAPURAM TALUK. TITm MOEEN, AGED 18 ymRs, D/a -SREENA romN KURAR, p{)TREN puRILyll], ARAcz EL, ARAcml. RARE, A¥IRAim LI,oon vll,IAGti , pATHANApuRn4 TAI.uK.

BY ADVS . •SRI . M . I . -SURE-SHRInnR SRI . R . ENTITH BESPoue ENT/REsporo ENT: MOHAN KURAR, AGED 52 YEARS, S/0 DIVIUKAEN, EBE__.Appeal NOs.i36O & 1459 Of 2Oi7 6 25 a 206 Of _2ng Eiu TREN vREDu, yERc OR MURI, REROOR vlLneE, pATEENApuRm4 TAI.uK-691 ool . BY ADVS . RASHEED C. NOORANAD M.N.ENITm THls rmTRIENlaL aEip EEL HAVING CCRE up ron ENlsslon On

13.12.2o2i, Aro NG wl TH RAT.AppEAhNo.1360/2ol7 END CORECTED CASES, TE[E COURT ON THE SARI DAY DElilv ERED THE FOLIIOwl NG: RALE|APPEAL Nos.1360 61459 of 2017 a 25 & 206 o£L±

JUDG MENT

4ifu HAMED MUSTAOUE. i The dispute between the parties to these appeals has been resolved in mediation. The mediated settlement agreement is on board along with the report of the mediator. The mediated settlement agreement is recorded. We, therefore, dispose of these appeals by superseding the impugned judgment, and granting decree in terms of the settlement agreement. The mediated settlement agreement will form part of the judgment. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE Sd/- SOPHY THOMAS, JUDGE AS

BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Mat Appeal Nos. 1360/2017 & 1459/20±Z & Mat Appeal NosE 25 & 206 of 2018_ Sreena @ Raji Mohan : Appellant Vs. Mohan Kumar : Respondent rl _MediatedsettlementA_greeme_n_I (Under Section 89 of the Code of Civi. Procedure read with Rule23 of the Civil Procedure (ADR) Rules, 2008) The parties have agreed to settle the disputes on the following terms and conditions;

1. The respondent Mohan Kumar owns 1 Acre and 89 cents as registered holding and 21 cents as excess land in his possession in Survey Nos.822/1/55/2, rl 822/1/55/1/4, 822/1/56/1, 822/1/56/2 in Thinkal

Karikkam Village in Punalur Taluk. The respondent Mohan Kumar agrees to part with 1 Acre 85 cents of property in his possession in favour of his wife Sreena @ Raji Mohan and his two children jinjitha Mohan and jitha Mohan. •&d&vvi Concil.iation Centre KeTalastateMedia"# H`gh Court of Kerala Koch.I -682 031 -2-

2. Mohan Kumar had prepared a draft Deed and sketch of

the entire property mentioned above. The parties had agreed to partition the above mentioned property in the same manner as reflected in the draft deed and in the sketch prepared. The draft deed and the sketch prepared, signed by all the parties concerned are appended herewith as Annexure 1 and 2 to this agreement.

a   3. The parties agree to execute the draft deed within one
      month in the Kulathupuzha S.R.O,                within         a period of
      30   days    from      the    date     of agreement                and   the

respondent Mohan Kumar shall bear the expenses for registration of the deeds in favour of the children and the Appellant Sreena @ Raji Mohan shall bear the expenses for registration of the deed in her name, as per the draft appended herewith.

4. Mohan Kumar and Sreena @ Raji Mohan agrees to file a A

Joint Petition for Divorce under Sec 13 8 of the Hindu Marriage Act, before the Family Court, Kottarakkara within a period of one month after the registration of the deeds as stated in Clause 3 in this agreement. J9cT€JLha Ke{a\as`ateMed`a`\on#dconc`uat`oncenm H'\ghCourtOfKeTa\a Koct`.`-682031 -3-

5. The parties agree that they shall not have any future

claims between them, in view of the settlement arrived .in this Appeal. Consequently the respective parties shall withdraw the cases in various Courts if any pending.

6. The Appellant Sreena @ Raji Mohan and two daughters

named above shall not claim any future maintenance and marriage expenses for children from the respondent Mohan Kumar after the execution of the deeds as stated above' EiE

7. Respondent Mohan Kumar agrees that if the deed as per

Annexure 1 and 2 appended herewith is not executed in time as mentioned above the affected parties can initiate appropriate proceedings to execute the terms of this agreement through the Court of law.

8. In view of the above settlement clauses this Hon.ble Court may be pleased to record the settlement and pass a Judgment and Decree in accordance with the same. rl Dated this the 19th November, 2021. Appellants Respondent

1. Sreena @ Raji Mohan fJ cayu Mohan Ku

2. jinjitha Mohan

3. jitha Mohan. AN ( f |i A -M ` iv Advocate for Appellant Advocate for the Respondent kefa`a§tat"ediation*C onciliation Centre High Court of Kerala kochi -682 031

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2019 Same Parties Mohankumar vs Sreena @ Raji Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice a.Muhamed Mustaque,Honourable Mrs. Jus...