Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Mr.E.Varadhan Vs M/s.Jansen Infrastructure Pvt Ltd.

Mr.E.Varadhan vs M/s.Jansen Infrastructure Pvt Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 01, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1880806

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
A/1715/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr.E.Varadhan

Respondent

M/s.Jansen Infrastructure Pvt Ltd.

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 01.04.2025coramthe honourable mr justice abdul quddhose e.varadhan .. applicant vs m/s.jansen infrastructure (p) ltd., rep. by its director s.p.senthilkumar .. respondentorderthis application has been filed under section 29a of the arbitration and conciliation act seeking extension of time for the arbitrator to pronounce an arbitral award. 2.mr.adinarayana rao, learned counsel, who has taken notice for the respondent, has stated no objection for allowing this application. 3.this court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application since sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant for seeking extension of time.abdul quddhose,j.vga 4.accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for by granting six months time for the arbitrator to pronounce an arbitral award from 27.04.2025. 01.04.2025 vga

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE E.Varadhan .. Applicant vs M/s.Jansen Infrastructure (P) Ltd., rep. by its Director S.P.Senthilkumar .. Respondent

ORDER

This application has been filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking extension of time for the Arbitrator to pronounce an arbitral award. 2.Mr.Adinarayana Rao, learned counsel, who has taken notice for the respondent, has stated no objection for allowing this application. 3.This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application since sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant for seeking extension of time.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

vga 4.Accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for by granting six months time for the Arbitrator to pronounce an Arbitral Award from 27.04.2025. 01.04.2025 vga

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Mr.E.Varadhan vs M/s.Jansen Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales