Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Reguraman.S vs State Rep by

Reguraman.S vs State Rep by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 08, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1879944

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/9152/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Reguraman.S

Respondent

State Rep by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 08.01.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice p.velmurugan and crl.m.p.no.5915 of 2023 reguraman s. ... petitioner vs.1. the state rep.by inspector of police, saidapet, chennai, crime no.11 of 2022.2. yogalakshmi ... respondentsprayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 cr.p.c./ 528 bnss 2023, to call for the records in f.i.r.no.11 of 2022 on the file of the 1st respondent, inspector of police, w-20 all women police station, saidapet, chennai, dated 31.10.2022 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent, without jurisdiction. for petitioner : mr.m.muruganantham for respondents : mr.s.sugendran additional public prosecutor for r1 private notice returned as unserved (unclaimed) for r2orderthis criminal original petition is filed to quash the f.i.r. in crime no. 11 of 2022, dated 31.10.2022 pending on the file of the first respondent-police.2. learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the firstrespondent-police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in crime no.11 of 2022, referred charge sheet vide r.c.s.no.39 of 2024 was filed before the learned ix metropolitan magistrate, saidapet, chennai on 08.05.2024.3. in view of the above submission made by the learned additionalpublic prosecutor, this criminal original petition is dismissed. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. index : yes/no neutral citation case : yes/no speaking order : yes/no ms to1. the ix metropolitan magistrate,2. the inspector of police, 3.the public prosecutor, high court, madras. p.velmurugan, j ms

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.01.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.5915 of 2023 Reguraman S. ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State rep.by Inspector of Police, Saidapet, Chennai, Crime No.11 of 2022.

2. Yogalakshmi ... Respondents

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS 2023, to call for the records in F.I.R.No.11 of 2022 on the file of the 1st respondent, Inspector of Police, W-20 All Women Police Station, Saidapet, Chennai, dated 31.10.2022 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent, without jurisdiction. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Muruganantham For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 Private notice returned as unserved (unclaimed) for R2

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No. 11 of 2022, dated 31.10.2022 pending on the file of the first respondent-Police.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first

respondent-Police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in Crime No.11 of 2022, Referred Charge Sheet vide R.C.S.No.39 of 2024 was filed before the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai on 08.05.2024.

3. In view of the above submission made by the learned Additional

Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To

1. The IX Metropolitan Magistrate,

2. The Inspector of Police, 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. P.VELMURUGAN, J ms

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial