Mr. Renuka Prasad vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Dec 02, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1879708

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1879708
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: M G UMA
Decided On: Dec 02, 2024
Case Number: CRL.P/2361/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. Renuka Prasad

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....not known to the petitioner joint director (inquiry and investigation) survey settlement and land records, k.r.circle, bengaluru - 560 048. …respondents (by sri. b.b. patil., advocate) this crl.p is filed u/s.482 cr.p.c praying to a) quash the fir dated 28.11.2019 in cr.no.41/2019 and the complaint dated 09.08.2016 registered by the respondent no.1 against the petitioner herein for the offence p/u/s 13(1)(c) of p.c. act and section 465, 468, 471 of ipc pending -2- on the file of xxiii addl. city civil and sessions judge, bengaluru vide annexure-a and etc.,this crl.p, coming on for orders, this day, orderwas made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mrs justice m g umaoral orderlearned counsel for the petitioner prays for time. office has raised objection seeking to produce the certified copies of the proceedings in cr. no.41/2019. till today, office objections are not complied. the order sheet dated 28.10.2024 reads as under: "learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time. the petition is of the year 2022. the matter is listed for third time for compliance of office objections. inspite of that the office objections are not complied with. i do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. however, to afford a final opportunity, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections.list this matter after one week." -3- learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has applied for the certified copies of the proceedings during november 2024. it shows that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the petition. hence, the petition is dismissed. sd/- (m g uma) judge bh list no.: 1 sl no.: 6

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2361 OF 2022 BETWEEN: MR. RENUKA PRASAD S/O LATE GANGADHARAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/A NO.1064, 31ST CROSS, SIT EXTENSION, TUMKUR - 572 101. …PETITIONER Digitally signed by (BY SRI. NISHANTH A.V., ADVOCATE) SWAPNA V Location: AND: high court of karnataka 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU BENGALURU CITY POLICE STATION, NO.49, KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER
2. SRI. C. N. SHRIDHAR
AGED MAJOR SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER JOINT DIRECTOR (INQUIRY AND INVESTIGATION) SURVEY SETTLEMENT AND LAND RECORDS, K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 048. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.B. PATIL., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO A) QUASH THE FIR DATED 28.11.2019 IN CR.NO.41/2019 AND THE COMPLAINT DATED 09.08.2016 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 13(1)(C) OF P.C. ACT AND SECTION 465, 468, 471 OF IPC PENDING -2- ON THE FILE OF XXIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time. Office has raised objection seeking to produce the certified copies of the proceedings in Cr. No.41/2019. Till today, office objections are not complied. The order sheet dated 28.10.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time. The petition is of the year 2022. The matter is listed for third time for compliance of office objections. Inspite of that the office objections are not complied with. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford a final opportunity, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections.

List this matter after one week." -3- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has applied for the certified copies of the proceedings during November 2024. It shows that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Mr. Renuka Prasad vs State of Karnataka Same Judge M G UMA

Inquiry and investigation Certified copies Joint Director Police Station high court D day