Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramja, vs State of Kerala,

RAMJA, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 08, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1879119

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/6965/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RAMJA,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque friday ,the 08th day of march 2019 / 17th phalguna, 1940 petitioner: ramja, aged 36 years d/o.ramaniamma, sivashakthi house, chunakkara vadakkum muri, chunakkara village, mavelikkara taluk, alappuzha. by adv. sri.manu roy respondents: 1 state of kerala, represented by the secretary, revenue department, govt. secretariat, thiruvananthapuram-695001. 2 the district collector, alappuzha-688001. 3 the tahsildar, mavelikkara taluk, alappuzha-690101. ac vidya gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 08.03.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe petitioner approached 3rd respondent to measure out the property and to fix the boundary as evident from ext.p6 as early as in 2014. since no consequential steps were taken, the petitioner approached this court. since more than 5 years elapsed, i think, it is appropriate that the petitioner to file a fresh application either form 8 or form 10 of the kerala survey and boundaries act, 1961. if any such application is filed, necessary steps shall be taken by the 3 rd respondent within a period of three months, thereafter, after, issuing notice to the petitioner and all other affected persons. the writ petition is disposed of as above.sas/08/03/2019 sd/- //true copy// a.muhamed mustaque p.a to judge judge appendix petitioner's exhibits:exhibit p1 true copy of document no.721/07. exhibit p2 true copy of document no.722/07. exhibit p3 true copy of document no.1704/14. exhibit p4 true copy of land tax receipt dated25.05.18. exhibit p5 true copy of land tax receipt dated 03.09.2018. exhibit p6 true copy of notice dated 30.07.2014. exhibit p7 true copy of representation dated 28.08.2014. exhibit p8 true copy of representation dated 29.08.2014.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1940 PETITIONER: RAMJA, AGED 36 YEARS D/O.RAMANIAMMA, SIVASHAKTHI HOUSE, CHUNAKKARA VADAKKUM MURI, CHUNAKKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.MANU ROY RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA-688001. 3 THE TAHSILDAR, MAVELIKKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA-690101. AC VIDYA GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached 3rd respondent to measure out the property and to fix the boundary as evident from Ext.P6 as early as in 2014. Since no consequential steps were taken, the petitioner approached this Court. Since more than 5 years elapsed, I think, it is appropriate that the petitioner to file a fresh application either Form 8 or Form 10 of the Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961. If any such application is filed, necessary steps shall be taken by the 3 rd respondent within a period of three months, thereafter, after, issuing notice to the petitioner and all other affected persons. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

SAS/08/03/2019 Sd/- //TRUE COPY// A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE P.A TO JUDGE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1           TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.721/07.
EXHIBIT P2           TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.722/07.
EXHIBIT P3           TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1704/14.
EXHIBIT P4           TRUE COPY OF LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED

25.05.18. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 03.09.2018. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 30.07.2014. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 28.08.2014. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 29.08.2014.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial