T.S.Junaith vs the State of Kerala,

T.S.Junaith vs The State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 28, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1875922

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1875922
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid
Decided On: Jun 28, 2019
Case Number: WP(C)/6336/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T.S.Junaith

Respondent

The State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....for rural development, rural development department, swaraj bhavan, 3 the director, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695 033. 4 the deputy superintendent of police, idukki unit, mutom(p.o), thodupuzha, pin - 685 587. by sri.a.rajesh, spl.public prosecutor, vacb this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 28.06.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: -: 2 :-judgmentthe writ petitioner's request is for a writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to take prompt decision on the request before him for prosecution sanction under section 19 of the p.c.act. it is submitted by the learned special public prosecutor for the vacb that the matter stands concluded, and the 2nd respondent has already granted the required sanction. in the above circumstances, the writ petition can be closed. the application filed by the writ petitioner as i.a.no.2/2019 to implead three other persons in the writ petition also can be closed, when no such actionis necessary now. the writ petitioner's grievance stands redressed otherwise. hence, the submission made by the learned special public prosecutor is recorded, and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. i.a.no.2/2019 will stand closed. sd/- p.ubaid judge jvt/28.6.2019 -: 3 :- appendix petitioner's exhibits :- exhibit p1 a true copy of the fir in vc.7/2012 of vigilance & anti corruption bureau, idukki unit dated 21.8.2012. exhibit p2 a true copy of letter no.e8(vc.7/12/idukki) 7.2.2018. exhibit p3 a true copy of judgment of this hon'ble court in wpc.no.5207/2019 dated 21.2.2019. respondents' exhibits :- nil //true copy// p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1941 WP(C).No.6336 of 2019 PETITIONER :- T.S.JUNAITH, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.(LATE) T.K.SAIDU MUHAMMED, VEO GRADE 1, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, KOTHAMANGALAM(P.O), ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS :- 1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, 2 THE COMMISSIONER FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SWARAJ BHAVAN, 3 THE DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 033. 4 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IDUKKI UNIT, MUTOM(P.O), THODUPUZHA, PIN - 685 587. BY SRI.A.RAJESH, SPL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, VACB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -: 2 :-

JUDGMENT

The writ petitioner's request is for a writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to take prompt decision on the request before him for prosecution sanction under Section 19 of the P.C.Act. It is submitted by the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the VACB that the matter stands concluded, and the 2nd respondent has already granted the required sanction. In the above circumstances, the writ petition can be closed. The application filed by the writ petitioner as I.A.No.2/2019 to implead three other persons in the writ petition also can be closed, when no such action

is necessary now. The writ petitioner's grievance stands redressed otherwise. Hence, the submission made by the learned Special Public Prosecutor is recorded, and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. I.A.No.2/2019 will stand closed. Sd/- P.UBAID JUDGE Jvt/28.6.2019 -: 3 :- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :- EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN VC.7/2012 OF VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, IDUKKI UNIT DATED 21.8.2012. EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.E8(VC.7/12/IDUKKI) 7.2.2018. EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC.NO.5207/2019 DATED 21.2.2019. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2019 Same Parties T.S.Junaith vs The State of Kerala, Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid