Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Flash Traders vs Rajesh Ramakrishnan

Flash Traders vs Rajesh Ramakrishnan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 29, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1874554

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/430/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Flash Traders

Respondent

Rajesh Ramakrishnan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice anu sivaraman friday ,the 29th day of march 2019 / 8th chaithra, 1941 con.case(c).no. 430 of 2019 in wp(c). 38118/2017 against the order/judgment in wp(c) 38118/2017 of highcourt petitioner/s:m/s flash traders hill produce dealer and commission agent, city centre, iritty, kannur-670703, represented by its proprietor m.p. abdul khader haji, s/o. moidu aged 63 years, by adv. sri.c.r.sivakumar respondent/s: rajesh ramakrishnan managing director, the kerala state cashew development corporation limited, chashew house, post box number 13, mundakkal, kollam-691001. other present: sri. vipin p.varghese, sc this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 29.03.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: con.case(c).no. 430 of 2019 2judgmentit is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the directions in the judgment have been complied with, though belatedly. the contempt of court case is accordingly closed. sd/- anu sivaraman judge rmm con.case(c).no. 430 of 2019 3 appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: annexure 1 the true copy of the communication dated respondents exhibits nil // true copy // p.a to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN FRIDAY ,THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 8TH CHAITHRA, 1941 Con.Case(C).No. 430 of 2019 IN WP(C). 38118/2017 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 38118/2017 of HIGHCOURT PETITIONER/S:

M/S FLASH TRADERS HILL PRODUCE DEALER AND COMMISSION AGENT, CITY CENTRE, IRITTY, KANNUR-670703, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR M.P. ABDUL KHADER HAJI, S/O. MOIDU AGED 63 YEARS, BY ADV. SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR RESPONDENT/S: RAJESH RAMAKRISHNAN MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, CHASHEW HOUSE, POST BOX NUMBER 13, MUNDAKKAL, KOLLAM-691001. OTHER PRESENT: SRI. VIPIN P.VARGHESE, SC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Con.Case(C).No. 430 of 2019 2

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the directions in the judgment have been complied with, though belatedly. The Contempt of Court Case is accordingly closed. SD/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE rmm Con.Case(C).No. 430 of 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE 1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial