Thaenamma vs the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons,

Thaenamma vs The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 27, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1874013

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1874013
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh,Honourable Mr.Justice V. Lakshminarayanan
Decided On: Jun 27, 2025
Case Number: WP/12041/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thaenamma

Respondent

The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 27.06.2025coram :the honourable mr. justice m.s.ramesh and the honourable mr. justice v.lakshminarayanan thaenamma ... petitioner vs. puzhal, chennai 600 066 ... respondentsprayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records connected with impugned order vide reference no.1833/r1/2025 dated 04.03.2025 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 28 days without escort to the detenue viz. nagajothi, w/o.chidambaram,hindu, aged about 30 years, convict no.1147, confined at prison (special) for women, puzhal, chennai - 600066. for petitioner : mr.n.vishnuvardhan for respondents : mr.e.raj thilak additional public prosecutororderand since the convict prisoner has not completed one year of imprisonment after she was granted leave by this court in w.p.no.32937 of 2024 dated 15.11.2024, for the period between 18.11.2024 and 23.11.2024, she would be ineligible to avail leave as contemplated under rule 22(3) of the tamil nadu suspension of sentence rules, 1982. 2.this writ petition stands dismissed accordingly. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [m.s.r, j.] [v.l.n, j.] kas to puzhal, chennai 600 066 3.the public prosecutor high court of madras chennai and kas

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.06.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Thaenamma ... Petitioner Vs. Puzhal, Chennai 600 066 ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records connected with impugned order vide reference No.1833/R1/2025 dated 04.03.2025 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 28 days without escort to the detenue viz. Nagajothi, W/o.Chidambaram,
Hindu, aged about 30 years, Convict No.1147, confined at Prison (Special) for Women, Puzhal, Chennai - 600066. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Vishnuvardhan For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

AND Since the convict prisoner has not completed one year of imprisonment after she was granted leave by this Court in W.P.No.32937 of 2024 dated 15.11.2024, for the period between 18.11.2024 and 23.11.2024, she would be ineligible to avail leave as contemplated under Rule 22(3) of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982. 2.This Writ Petition Stands dismissed accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.S.R, J.] [V.L.N, J.] kas To Puzhal, Chennai 600 066 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Chennai and kas

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Thaenamma vs The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh,Honourable Mr.Justice V. La...