Smt. Shanthamma vs the Executive Engineer

Smt. Shanthamma vs The Executive Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jan 31, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1873149

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1873149
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: C M Joshi
Decided On: Jan 31, 2024
Case Number: RFA/105/2011

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt. Shanthamma

Respondent

The Executive Engineer

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 31st day of january, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice c m joshi regular first appeal no. 105 of 2011 (inj) between: smt. shanthamma, w/o late krishna reddy, aged about 63 years, r/at kodathi village, varthur hobli, bangalore south taluk. …appellant (by sri b j mahesh, advocate [absent]) and:1. the executive engineer, d.c works division (south), a.r circle, bangalore-560 009.2. the assistant executive engineer, digitally signedby bws& sb, division no.1(south), annapurna g jayanagar, bangalore-560 009. location: high …respondentscourt of karnataka (by sri prashant.t pandit, advocate for r1 & r2) this rfa is filed under sec.96 of cpc., against the judgment and decree dated 17.9.2010 passed in o.s.no.3684/2001 on the file of the ix addl. city civil & sessions judge, bangalore, dismissing the suit for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction. this appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the court delivered the following: -2-judgmentnone appeared for the appellant either in the morning session or in the afternoon session.2. learned counsel for the respondents present.3. since the matter was adjourned on the last occasion suo moto by this court, learned counsel for respondents submits that there is no reason to adjourn the matter.4. therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- judge tsn* list no.: 1 sl no.: 41

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 105 OF 2011 (INJ) BETWEEN: SMT. SHANTHAMMA, W/O LATE KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT KODATHI VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK. …APPELLANT (BY SRI B J MAHESH, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, D.C WORKS DIVISION (SOUTH), A.R CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 009.
2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, Digitally signed
by                   BWS& SB, DIVISION NO.1(SOUTH),
ANNAPURNA G          JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 009.
Location: High                                           …RESPONDENTS
Court of Karnataka (BY SRI PRASHANT.T PANDIT, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.9.2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.3684/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND MANDATORY INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

JUDGMENT

None appeared for the appellant either in the Morning Session or in the Afternoon Session.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents present.

3. Since the matter was adjourned on the last occasion suo moto by this Court, learned counsel for respondents submits that there is no reason to adjourn the matter.

4. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE tsn* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Smt. Shanthamma vs The Executive Engineer Same Judge C M Joshi