Sridhar C vs the State of Karnataka

Sridhar C vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Apr 25, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1871250

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1871250
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: S Vishwajith Shetty
Decided On: Apr 25, 2024
Case Number: CRL.P/1482/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sridhar C

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 25th day of april, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice s vishwajith shetty criminal petition no. 1482 of 2024 between: sridhar c s/o chandrappa aged about 24 years residing at nekkundi dommasandra badavane sarjapura hobli, anekal taluk bengaluru urban district pin code - 562 125. …petitioner (by sri venkatesh b.k, adv.) and: the state of karnataka rep by the station house officer, varthur police station bengaluru rep by state public digitallysigned by prosecutor, high court building pavithra n bengaluru - 560 001. location: …respondenthigh court of karnataka (by sri r. rangaswamy, hcgp) this crl.p filed u/s 439 cr.pc praying to allow the petition and release the petitioner / accused no.1 on bail in s.c.no.153/2023 (arising out of cr.no.34/2023) of varthur police station, bengaluru, for the alleged offence p/u/s 302, 120b r/w 34 of ipc, pending on the file of honble ix addl. district and sessions judge, bengaluru rural district at bengaluru. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following: -2-order1. learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing thematter for some time, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach this court afresh after examination of cws 3 to 6, who are the alleged eye witnesses to the incident in question, is completed.2. the submission of learned counsel is placed on record.3. petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.4. it is needless to state that the prosecution shall examine cws3 to 6 on priority during the course of trial. sd/- judge dn

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1482 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRIDHAR C S/O CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS RESIDING AT NEKKUNDI DOMMASANDRA BADAVANE SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT PIN CODE - 562 125. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VENKATESH B.K, ADV.) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VARTHUR POLICE STATION BENGALURU REP BY STATE PUBLIC Digitally
signed by      PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING
PAVITHRA N     BENGALURU - 560 001.
Location:                                                     …RESPONDENT
High Court of Karnataka (BY SRI R. RANGASWAMY, HCGP) THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 439 CR.PC PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND RELEASE THE PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 ON BAIL IN S.C.NO.153/2023 (ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.34/2023) OF VARTHUR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 302, 120B R/W 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE IX ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: -2-

ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the

matter for some time, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court afresh after examination of CWs 3 to 6, who are the alleged eye witnesses to the incident in question, is completed.

2. The submission of learned counsel is placed on record.

3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

4. It is needless to state that the prosecution shall examine Cws3 to 6 on priority during the course of trial. SD/- JUDGE DN

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Sridhar C vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge S Vishwajith Shetty