Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kuppu vs the State Rep by the Deputy Inspsector of Central Prison

kuppu vs The State Rep by the Deputy Inspsector of Central Prison

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 29, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1871165

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/11058/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

kuppu

Respondent

The State Rep by the Deputy Inspsector of Central Prison

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 29.04.2025coram :the honourable mr. justice m.s. ramesh and the honourable mr. justice n.senthilkumar kuppu ... petitioner/mother of the detenue vs.1. the state rep by the deputy inspsector of general of prison, gandhi irwin road, egmore, chennai -600 008puzhal central prison -1, puzhal 600 066. ... respondents prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records connected with the impugned order dated 12.02.2025 in proceedings no. 709542/thaku2/2025 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 28 days without escort to the detenue prasanth s/o. murugan aged about 33 years bearing convict no. 9238 pid no. 446377), confined at central prison -1 puzhal.for petitioner : ms.s.sahdana for respondents : mr.r.muniyapparaj additional public prosecutor assisted by mr.m.sylvester johnorderand the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition. she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.2. in view of the submission and endorsement made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [m.s.r., j] [n.s., j] index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet: yes/no neutral citation: yes/no anu to 1.the deputy inspector general of prison, gandhi irwin road, egmore, chennai-600008. puzhal central prison-i, puzhal-600 066. 3.the public prosecutor, high court, madras. and anu

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.04.2025

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Kuppu ... Petitioner/mother of the detenue Vs.

1. The State Rep By The Deputy Inspsector Of General of Prison, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai -600 008

Puzhal Central Prison -1, Puzhal 600 066. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records connected with the impugned order dated 12.02.2025 in proceedings No. 709542/thaku2/2025 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 28 days without escort to the detenue Prasanth S/o. Murugan aged about 33 years bearing convict No. 9238 PID No. 446377), confined at central Prison -1 Puzhal.

For Petitioner : Ms.S.Sahdana For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

ORDER

and The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned

counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.S.R., J] [N.S., J] Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Anu To 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600008. Puzhal Central Prison-I, Puzhal-600 066. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. and Anu

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial