Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Renuka Wines vs the Commissioner of Excise

Renuka Wines vs The Commissioner of Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 02, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1870873

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/5035/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Renuka Wines

Respondent

The Commissioner of Excise

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 2nd day of february, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice s.r.krishna kumar writ petition no. 5035 of 2022 (excise) between: renuka wines represented by its proprietor sri. p. v. sathish, s/o. late t. venkatappa, aged about 64 years, residing at no. 24/31, nkm corner building, 1st main road, 2nd cross, papireddypalya, 2nd stage, nagarabhavi, bengaluru-560 070. …petitioner (by sri. srinivasa k.,advocate) and:1. the commissioner of excisebmtc complex, double road, digitally shanthinagar, bangalore-560 027. signed by anand n location: 2. the deputy commissioner high court of karnataka shivamogga district, shivamogga-577 201.3. the deputy commissioner of excise ’abakari bhavana’, deputy commissioner compound, shivamogga city, shivamogga-577 201. …respondents (by sri.shamanth naik., hcgp) -2- this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to-quash the impugned endorsement dated 22.11.2020 issued by the r2 vide annexure-h to the writ petitiondirect the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 08.06.2020 vide annexure-f2 and to renew the cl-2 license so issued to the petitioner earlier and with further direction to allow the petitioner to trade/sell the liquor as per the terms of the license. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.2. memo is placed on record.3. the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- judge an/-

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 5035 OF 2022 (EXCISE) BETWEEN: RENUKA WINES REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. P. V. SATHISH, S/O. LATE T. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 24/31, NKM CORNER BUILDING, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS, PAPIREDDYPALYA, 2ND STAGE, NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU-560 070. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVASA K.,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE

BMTC COMPLEX, DOUBLE ROAD, Digitally SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027. signed by ANAND N Location: 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201.

3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE ’ABAKARI BHAVANA’, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMPOUND, SHIVAMOGGA CITY, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP) -2- THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 22.11.2020 ISSUED BY THE R2 VIDE ANNEXURE-H TO THE WRIT PETITION

DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 08.06.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-F2 AND TO RENEW THE CL-2 LICENSE SO ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER EARLIER AND WITH FURTHER DIRECTION TO ALLOW THE PETITIONER TO TRADE/SELL THE LIQUOR AS PER THE TERMS OF THE LICENSE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.

2. Memo is placed on record.

3. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE AN/-

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Renuka Wines vs The Commissioner of Excise Same Judge S.R.Krishna Kumar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales