Anish vs the Assistant Engineer

ANISH vs The Assistant Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 28, 2019

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1869237

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1869237
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran
Decided On: Feb 28, 2019
Case Number: WP(C)/4933/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ANISH

Respondent

The Assistant Engineer

Excerpt

.....that the said application is not supported by any of the necessary documents and or proof of identity. he says that if the petitioner approaches the 1st respondent with all such documents, the said authority will consider the said application without any further delay.3. on hearing sri.arun kumar as afore, sri.c.a.navas,the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client will approach the 1st respondent with all the necessary documents and prays that the authority be directed to consider his application in terms of latest circular of the kseb dated 02.11.2018.in the afore circumstances, i order that, if the petitioner approaches the 1st respondent with all necessary and applicable documents including identity proof, within period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the said authority will consider the application of the petitioner, adverting to all the applicable circulars, including the circular afore mentioned by sri.n.a.navas; and take a decision thereon, as expeditiously as is possible but not later than one month after the petitioner approaches the said authority.sd/- devan ramachandran judge pvappendix petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of the residential/ownership certificate in the name of travancore rubber and tea company limited, dated 18.2.2013. exhibit p2 true copy of the application dated nil along with fee receipt dated 4.6.2018. exhibit p3 true copy of the letter dated 6.3.2018. exhibit p4 true copy of the noc dated 16.1.2019. exhibit p5 true copy of the application dated 5.12.2018. respondents' exhibits: nil \\true copy//pa to judge pv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THURSDAY ,THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1940 PETITIONER/S: ANISH AGED 39 YEARS S/O. SIVAN, RAJAMANAYIL HOUSE, VALLAMKAM DESOM, KUPPAKKAYAM P.O., MUNDAKKAYAM. BY ADVS. SRI.T.K.SASIKUMAR SRI.C.A.NAVAS RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PERUVANTHANAM, MUNDAKKAYAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT, 685 612. 2 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BORD, PEERUMED, MUNDAKKAYAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT 685 612. SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR-SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The limited prayer of the petitioner is that his application for an electric connection, namely Exhibit-P5, be directed to be disposed of by the respondents within a time frame.

2. Sri. Arun Kumar, the learned Standing Counsel for

the State Kerala Electricity Board Ltd. (herein-after referred to as KSEB for short), submits that they have received the application only on 15.02.2019 by post and that the said application is not supported by any of the necessary documents and or proof of identity. He says that if the petitioner approaches the 1st respondent with all such documents, the said Authority will consider the said application without any further delay.

3. On hearing Sri.Arun Kumar as afore, Sri.C.A.Navas,

the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client will approach the 1st respondent with all the necessary documents and prays that the Authority be directed to consider his application in terms of latest circular of the KSEB dated 02.11.2018.

In the afore circumstances, I order that, if the petitioner approaches the 1st respondent with all necessary and applicable documents including identity proof, within period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the said Authority will consider the application of the petitioner, adverting to all the applicable circulars, including the circular afore mentioned by Sri.N.A.Navas; and take a decision thereon, as expeditiously as is possible but not later than one month after the petitioner approaches the said Authority.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE PV

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RESIDENTIAL/OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE IN THE NAME OF TRAVANCORE RUBBER AND TEA COMPANY LIMITED, DATED 18.2.2013. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED NIL ALONG WITH FEE RECEIPT DATED 4.6.2018. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 6.3.2018. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOC DATED 16.1.2019. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 5.12.2018. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL \\TRUE COPY//

PA TO JUDGE PV

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2019 Same Parties ANISH vs The Assistant Engineer Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran

Not later than high court The State True copy