Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanoop, vs State of Kerala

Sanoop, vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 28, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1868430

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1240/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanoop,

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sunil thomas thursday ,the 28th day of february 2019 / 9th phalguna, 1940 bail appl..no. 1240 of 2019 crime no. 49/2019 of thrikkakara police station , ernakulam petitioner/accused: sanoop, aged 24 years s/o.yousef, madappally house, kambivelikkakam, kakkanad, kochi-682030 by adv. smt.o.h.nazeeba respondent/complainant: state of kerala rep. by the public prosecutor high court of kerala ernakulam (on behalf of s.i of police, thrikkakara police station) other present: pp ajith murali this bail application having come up for admission on 28.02.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a.1240/19 2orderpetitioner herein unsuccessfully moved an application for bail by filing b.a.no.405 of 2019 along with the co-accused. the request for bail of the petitioner was rejected and co-accused were granted bail. petitioner has approached this court again contenting that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, which could not be brought to the notice of this court. it was also contended that, medical records were not available earlier.2. it seems that the wound certificate issued by the thrikkakkara municipal co-operative hospital is available on file. it shows that, therewas a fracture of the neck of the 5th metacarpal. regarding the other injury, there was contusion 2x2 cm on the temporal region. it does not appear to be very grievous.3. having considered these facts, i am inclined to grantpermission to the petitioner herein to surrender before the investigating officer within 10 days from today. after interrogation, identification and recovery, if any, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate who shall consider his bail application on the same day itself having due regard to the fact that, he is not involved in any other crime.bail application is disposed of as above. sd/- sunil thomas judge sbna

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS THURSDAY ,THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1940 Bail Appl..No. 1240 of 2019 CRIME NO. 49/2019 OF Thrikkakara Police Station , Ernakulam PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SANOOP, AGED 24 YEARS S/O.YOUSEF, MADAPPALLY HOUSE, KAMBIVELIKKAKAM, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682030 BY ADV. SMT.O.H.NAZEEBA RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM (ON BEHALF OF S.I OF POLICE, THRIKKAKARA POLICE STATION) OTHER PRESENT: PP AJITH MURALI THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.1240/19 2

ORDER

Petitioner herein unsuccessfully moved an application for bail by filing B.A.No.405 of 2019 along with the co-accused. The request for bail of the petitioner was rejected and co-accused were granted bail. Petitioner has approached this Court again contenting that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, which could not be brought to the notice of this Court. It was also contended that, medical records were not available earlier.

2. It seems that the wound certificate issued by the Thrikkakkara Municipal Co-operative Hospital is available on file. It shows that, there

was a fracture of the neck of the 5th metacarpal. Regarding the other injury, there was contusion 2x2 cm on the temporal region. It does not appear to be very grievous.

3. Having considered these facts, I am inclined to grant

permission to the petitioner herein to surrender before the investigating officer within 10 days from today. After interrogation, identification and recovery, if any, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate who shall consider his bail application on the same day itself having due regard to the fact that, he is not involved in any other crime.

Bail application is disposed of as above. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS JUDGE Sbna

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial