S Babu Vs Lakshmi

S Babu vs Lakshmi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 23, 2025

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1866030

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1866030
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi
Decided On: Sep 23, 2025
Case Number: CMP/8598/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S Babu

Respondent

Lakshmi

Excerpt

inthese petitions have been filed (i) to condone the delay of 3242 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent, namely ayothiraman, (ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent and, (iii) to bring on record the respondents 8 to 11 herein, as legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent, namely ayothiraman, and rank them as further respondents in s.a. no.583 of 2024, respectively.2. the learned counsel for the respondents did not raise any objectionin allowing these petitions and this court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavits filed in support of the above petitions. hence, these civil miscellaneous petitions are allowed.3. the registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in s.a. no.583 of 2024 and list the same in usual course. [½] bga bga in [1/2]

Full Judgment

These petitions have been filed (i) to condone the delay of 3242 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent, namely Ayothiraman, (ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent and, (iii) to bring on record the respondents 8 to 11 herein, as legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent, namely Ayothiraman, and rank them as further respondents in S.A. No.583 of 2024, respectively.

2. The learned counsel for the respondents did not raise any objection

in allowing these petitions and this Court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavits filed in support of the above petitions. Hence, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.

3. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in S.A. No.583 of 2024 and list the same in usual course. [½] bga bga in [1/2]

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties S Babu vs Lakshmi Same Judge Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi