Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

G S Vasudeva vs Kumarasetty

G S Vasudeva vs Kumarasetty

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 28, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1865786

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A/41/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

G S Vasudeva

Respondent

Kumarasetty

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 28th day of june, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice shivashankar amarannavar criminal appeal no. 41 of 2014 between: g s vasudeva s/o channappa aged about 51 years agriculturist r/o gorahalli village bettadapura hobli piriyapattana taluk …appellant digitally signed by lakshminarayana (by sri hiremath m v, advocate - absent) murthy rajashri location: high and: court of karnataka kumarasetty s/o late rudrasetty aged about 53 years auto driver r/o c/o madaiah, door no.321 2nd cross, ramanuja road …respondent (by sri shrikara p k, advocate - absent)this crl.a. is filed u/s.378(4) cr.p.c praying to set aside the judgment and order dated:3.7.13 passed by the civil judge and jmfc, periyapatna in c.c.no.509/2010 - acquitting the respondent/accused for the offence p/u/s 138 of n.i. act and etc., -2- this appeal coming on for arguments this day, the court delivered the following:judgmentlearned counsel for the appellant is absent.2. learned counsel for the appellant was alsoabsent on 13.12.2023, 03.01.2024 and 11.01.2024. this court on 11.01.2024 even noted absence of learned counsel for the appellant has granted an opportunity subject to the payment of cost of rs.500/- payable to the legal service authority. inspite of the said order, learned counsel for the appellant neither paid cost nor appeared before the court to argue the matter. it appears that appellant is not interested in prosecuting this matter.3. hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- judge dsp list no.: 1 sl no.: 53

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 41 OF 2014 BETWEEN: G S VASUDEVA S/O CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O GORAHALLI VILLAGE BETTADAPURA HOBLI PIRIYAPATTANA TALUK …APPELLANT Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA (BY SRI HIREMATH M V, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH AND: COURT OF KARNATAKA KUMARASETTY S/O LATE RUDRASETTY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS AUTO DRIVER R/O C/O MADAIAH, DOOR No.321 2ND CROSS, RAMANUJA ROAD …RESPONDENT (BY SRI SHRIKARA P K, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED:3.7.13 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA IN C.C.No.509/2010 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT AND ETC., -2- THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ARGUMENTS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant is absent.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant was also

absent on 13.12.2023, 03.01.2024 and 11.01.2024. This Court on 11.01.2024 even noted absence of learned counsel for the appellant has granted an opportunity subject to the payment of cost of Rs.500/- payable to the Legal Service Authority. Inspite of the said order, learned counsel for the appellant neither paid cost nor appeared before the Court to argue the matter. It appears that appellant is not interested in prosecuting this matter.

3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial