Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.a.Antony vs Sunil Kumar @ Suni

K.a.Antony vs Sunil Kumar @ Suni

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 10, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1864584

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A/1037/2006

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.a.Antony

Respondent

Sunil Kumar @ Suni

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice t.v.anilkumar tuesday, the 10th day of december 2019 / 19th agrahayana, crl.a.no.1037 of 2006 against cc 881/2002 dated 18-12-2004 of judicial magistrate of first class -i,kochi appellant/complainant: k.a.antony s/o.alexander, kattassery house, karthedom, malipuram p.o., by adv. sri.m.p.ramnath respondents/accused & state of kerala:1 sunil kumar @ suni s/o.sahadevan, koyippilly, munambam desom, pallipuram village,, pallipuram p.o., 2 the state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam. r1 by adv. sri.p.p.subhash chandran r1 by adv. sri.shaji thankappan r2 by sri.m.s.breez, sr.public prosecutor this criminal appeal having been finally heard on 10.12.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: crl.a 1037/06 -:2:-judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled out of court and therefore, the prosecution of appeal is not necessary and he wants to withdraw the appeal. the appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn. accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- t.v.anilkumar judge vps /true copy/ ps to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA, CRL.A.No.1037 OF 2006 AGAINST CC 881/2002 DATED 18-12-2004 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I,KOCHI APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT: K.A.ANTONY S/O.ALEXANDER, KATTASSERY HOUSE, KARTHEDOM, MALIPURAM P.O., BY ADV. SRI.M.P.RAMNATH RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED & STATE OF KERALA:

1 SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNI S/O.SAHADEVAN, KOYIPPILLY, MUNAMBAM DESOM, PALLIPURAM VILLAGE,, PALLIPURAM P.O., 2 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.SUBHASH CHANDRAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI THANKAPPAN R2 BY SRI.M.S.BREEZ, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.A 1037/06 -:2:-

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled out of court and therefore, the prosecution of appeal is not necessary and he wants to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- T.V.ANILKUMAR JUDGE vps /True Copy/ PS to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial