Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

L Anantha Kumar vs State of Karnataka

L Anantha Kumar vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Feb 29, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1863889

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/790/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

L Anantha Kumar

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 29th day of february, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice rajendra badamikar criminal petition no. 790 of 2024 between: l. anantha kumar, s/o late v. linganna, aged about 53 years, no. 236/1, 3rd main, 3rd cross, chamarajpet, bengaluru - 560 018. …petitioner (by sri. m.j. alva, advocate) and: state of karnataka, halasuru gate police, halasuru gate police station, bengaluru - 560 002, represented by state public prosecutor, digitally signedby sowmya d high court of karnataka building, location: high bengaluru - 560 001. court of …respondentkarnataka (by sri. b. lakshman, hcgp) this crl.p is filed u/s.438 of cr.p.c praying to direct the respondent police to release the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest for the alleged offence p/us.406 and 420 of ipc or for any other non bailable offence on the basis of the compliant lodged by his sister smt.parvathamma and smt.hemavathi conditionally. -2- this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:orderlearned hcgp produces a letter submitted by sho of halasuru gate police station, bengaluru-02, wherein it is submitted that the complaint registered in crime no. endorsement was also given to complainant smt. parvathamma alias padma.2. in view of the closer of the complaint, there isno apprehension of arrest of the petitioner. hence, question of seeking anticipatory bail does not arise at all. hence, in view of the report submitted by the sho, the petition itself become infructuous. accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. sd/- judge urn list no.: 1 sl no.: 36 ct: bhk

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 790 OF 2024 BETWEEN: L. ANANTHA KUMAR, S/O LATE V. LINGANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO. 236/1, 3RD MAIN, 3RD CROSS, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU - 560 018. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.J. ALVA, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA, HALASURU GATE POLICE, HALASURU GATE POLICE STATION, BENGALURU - 560 002, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Digitally signed

by SOWMYA D        HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING,
Location: High     BENGALURU - 560 001.
Court of                                                      …RESPONDENT

Karnataka (BY SRI. B. LAKSHMAN, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.438 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/US.406 AND 420 OF IPC OR FOR ANY OTHER NON BAILABLE OFFENCE ON THE BASIS OF THE COMPLIANT LODGED BY HIS SISTER SMT.PARVATHAMMA AND SMT.HEMAVATHI CONDITIONALLY. -2- THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Learned HCGP produces a letter submitted by SHO of Halasuru Gate Police Station, Bengaluru-02, wherein it is submitted that the complaint registered in Crime No. endorsement was also given to complainant Smt. Parvathamma alias Padma.

2. In view of the closer of the complaint, there is

no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner. Hence, question of seeking anticipatory bail does not arise at all. Hence, in view of the report submitted by the SHO, the petition itself become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE URN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36 CT: BHK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial