Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Geetha vs Bale Pandian

Geetha vs Bale Pandian

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 09, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1863801

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/27915/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Geetha

Respondent

Bale Pandian

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.27915 of 2024 and a.s.sr.no.43950 of 2024dr.g.jayachandran, j.this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 211 days in filing the a.s.sr.no.43950 of 2024.2. notice has been duly served on the respondent. however, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent and no counter affidavit has been filed.3. the appeal has been filed by the aggrieved defendant against a money decree. the delay of 211 days in preferring appeal is attributed to the illiteracy of the appellant.4. being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 211 days is condoned and this petition is ordered accordingly. 09.06.2025 rpl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.27915 of 2024 and A.S.SR.No.43950 of 2024

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 211 days in filing the A.S.SR.No.43950 of 2024.

2. Notice has been duly served on the respondent. However, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent and no counter affidavit has been filed.

3. The Appeal has been filed by the aggrieved defendant against a money decree. The delay of 211 days in preferring appeal is attributed to the illiteracy of the appellant.

4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 211 days is condoned and this petition is ordered accordingly. 09.06.2025 rpl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Geetha vs Bale Pandian Same Judge Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales