P Jayanath vs the State of Karnataka

P Jayanath vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 28, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1863515

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1863515
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Suraj Govindaraj
Decided On: Feb 28, 2024
Case Number: CRL.P/4024/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P Jayanath

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 28th day of february, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice suraj govindaraj criminal petition no. 4024 of 2018 (482) between: p jayanath aged about 45 years, s/o p hanumantha rao, r/at nio.324, ward 15, 7th cross, m.j.nagar, hosapere, bellary-583201 partner m/s rajapur mines …petitioner (by sri. ravi l vaidya.,advocate) and: the state of karnataka through superintendent of police special investigation team, karnataka lokayukta, bengaluru-01 digitally signed by narayanappa …respondent lakshmamma (by sri. m.r. patil., hcgp) location: high court of karnataka this criminal petition is filed u/s.482 cr.p.c prayingto set aside the order dated 16.05.2018 passed by the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge, special judge, bangalore urban district, bangalore (cch-24) in crl.misc.no. 7529/2015 under which the anticipatory bail granted to him is cancelled and etc this criminal petition, coming on for admission, this day, the court made the following: -2-order1. the petitioner is before this court seeking for the following reliefs:a. set-aside the order dated 16.5.2018 passed by the hon’ble court of the xxiii additional city civil & sessions judge, special judge, bengaluru urban district, cch-24, bangalore, in crl. misc.no.7529/2015 under which the anticipatory bail granted to him is cancelled and; b. pass such other orders as this hon’ble court deem fit under the facts and circumstances of the case.2. learned counsel for the petitioner who appears through video conferencing submits that the above petition is rendered infructuous.3. accepting the said submission, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- judge ln list no.: 1 sl no.: 65

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4024 OF 2018 (482) BETWEEN: P JAYANATH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O P HANUMANTHA RAO, R/AT NIO.324, WARD 15, 7TH CROSS, M.J.NAGAR, HOSAPERE, BELLARY-583201 PARTNER M/S RAJAPUR MINES …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI L VAIDYA.,ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION TEAM, KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA, BENGALURU-01 Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA …RESPONDENT LAKSHMAMMA (BY SRI. M.R. PATIL., HCGP) Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.05.2018 PASSED BY THE XXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SPECIAL JUDGE, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE (CCH-24) IN CRL.MISC.NO. 7529/2015 UNDER WHICH THE ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED TO HIM IS CANCELLED AND ETC THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: -2-

ORDER

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

a. Set-aside the order dated 16.5.2018 passed by the Hon’ble Court of the XXIII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Special Judge, Bengaluru Urban District, CCH-24, Bangalore, in Crl. Misc.No.7529/2015 under which the anticipatory bail granted to him is cancelled and; b. Pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deem fit under the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner who appears through video conferencing submits that the above petition is rendered infructuous.

3. Accepting the said submission, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- JUDGE LN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties P Jayanath vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge Suraj Govindaraj