G Narayanappa vs the Divisional Controller

G Narayanappa vs The Divisional Controller

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 28, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1861979

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1861979
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Jyoti Mulimani
Decided On: Jun 28, 2024
Case Number: WP/14657/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

G Narayanappa

Respondent

The Divisional Controller

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 28th day of june, 2024before the hon'ble ms. justice jyoti mulimani writ petition no. 14657 of 2016 (s-ksrtc) between: g.narayanappa s/o gangappa, aged about 42 years, conductor, badge no.6066, b.m.t.c., depot no.23, r/at no 23, chikka muddenahalli, dubinakere post and hobli, doddaballapura taluk, bangalore rural district. …petitioner (by sri. lakshman rao., advocate [absent]) and: the divisional controller, b.m.t.c., north division, central office, shanthinagar, bangalore-560 027.digitally signed by premchandra m …respondent r (by smt. h.r.renuka., advocate) location: high court of karnataka this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, seeking certain reliefs. this writ petition is coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:order.when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. -2- smt.h.r.renuka., learned counsel for the respondent has appeared in person. as could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 21.06.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence it was ordered to be listed on 28.06.2024 subject to payment of cost of rs.2,000/- (rupees two thousand only) to karnataka advocates' clerk benevolent trust, high court of karnataka, bengaluru. the petition is listed today. as already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. the cost of rs.2,000/- (rupees two thousand only) is also not paid. it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- judge mrp list no.: 1 sl no.: 12

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 14657 OF 2016 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: G.NARAYANAPPA S/O GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.6066, B.M.T.C., DEPOT NO.23, R/AT NO 23, CHIKKA MUDDENAHALLI, DUBINAKERE POST AND HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LAKSHMAN RAO., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, B.M.T.C., NORTH DIVISION, CENTRAL OFFICE, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M …RESPONDENT R (BY SMT. H.R.RENUKA., ADVOCATE) Location: High Court of Karnataka THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER.

When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. -2- Smt.H.R.Renuka., learned counsel for the respondent has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 21.06.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence it was ordered to be listed on 28.06.2024 subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) to Karnataka Advocates' Clerk Benevolent Trust, High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. The cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) is also not paid. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties G Narayanappa vs The Divisional Controller Same Judge Jyoti Mulimani