Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kumar Gowda vs the State of Karnataka

Kumar Gowda vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Mar 28, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1860797

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CCC/62/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kumar Gowda

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....secretary department of revenue 5th floor, m.s.building 2nd stage, dr b r ambedkar veedhi bengaluru - 560 0012. the committee for regularisation of unauthorised occupation of government lands represented by its secretary -2- bengaluru rural district- 562 1233. arundathi the tahsildar tahasildar office …accused (by sri s.s.mahendra, government advocate) this ccc is filed under sections 11 and 12 ofthe contempt of courts act, 1971 r/w article 215 of the constitution of india praying to allow the petition and consequently initiate contempt proceedings against the accused no.3 the willfuland deliberate disobedience of the final orderdated 30.09.2021 passed in w.p.no.16144/2021 (klr-rr) passed by this honble court and punish the accused under the provision of the contempt of court act, 1971. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, krishna s dixit j., made the following:orderin this contempt proceedings, the grievance is as to non-compliance of the order made by the learned single judge of this court in w.p no.16144/2021 (klr-rr/sur) disposed off on 30.09.2021.2. after service of notice, learned government advocateappearing for the respondents submits that the committee for regularisation of unauthorised occupation is yet to be formed, and -3- that would happen before long. he further submits that once the committee is formed, within a period of six weeks the matter would be placed before it for taking appropriate action and the committee will be requested to hear & dispose off the subject application expeditiously in accordance with law. with this proposal, learned advocate for the complainant is also agreeable. this is appreciable. in view of the above, this complaint of contempt is disposed off, costs having been made easy. chief justice judge ahb list no.: 1 sl no.: 59

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT CCC NO. 62 OF 2023 (CIVIL) BETWEEN:

1. KUMAR GOWDA S/O HANUMANTHARAYA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT HANCHIPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI OMKAR N, ADVOCATE FOR SRI RAGHU M, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B AND: Location: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA High Court of Karnataka REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING 2ND STAGE, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001

2. THE COMMITTEE FOR REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION OF GOVERNMENT LANDS REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY -2- BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT- 562 123

3. ARUNDATHI THE TAHSILDAR TAHASILDAR OFFICE …ACCUSED (BY SRI S.S.MAHENDRA, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF

THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.3 THE WILLFUL

AND DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE FINAL ORDER

DATED 30.09.2021 PASSED IN W.P.NO.16144/2021 (KLR-RR) PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, KRISHNA S DIXIT J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

In this contempt proceedings, the grievance is as to non-compliance of the order made by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P No.16144/2021 (KLR-RR/SUR) disposed off on 30.09.2021.

2. After service of notice, learned Government Advocate

appearing for the respondents submits that the Committee for Regularisation of Unauthorised Occupation is yet to be formed, and -3- that would happen before long. He further submits that once the Committee is formed, within a period of six weeks the matter would be placed before it for taking appropriate action and the Committee will be requested to hear & dispose off the subject application expeditiously in accordance with law. With this proposal, learned advocate for the complainant is also agreeable. This is appreciable. In view of the above, this complaint of contempt is disposed off, costs having been made easy. CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial