Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Krishnappa R vs Shankar R

Krishnappa R vs Shankar R

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jul 23, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1859507

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.RP/119/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnappa R

Respondent

Shankar R

Excerpt

.....road, sbm colony,digitally brindavan nagar, signed by benglauru - 560 054. malatesh …respondent kc (by sri. syed hussain, advocate for location: sri. virupakshaiah p h.,advocate)high court of karnataka this crl.rp is filed under section 397 r/w 401 cr.p.c praying to set aside the impugned order of crl.a.no.130/2022 dated 11.10.2023 by the lxiv additional city civil and sessions judge, cch-65, bengaluru and conviction, sentence and fine imposed by the learned xxii addl.c.m.m., bengaluru videjudgment dated 15.11.2021 passed in c.c.no.14672/2018and further be pleased to acquit the petitioner for the offence p/u/s 138 of n.i. act. -2- this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: the hon'ble mr justice v srishanandaoral order(per: the hon'ble mr justice v srishananda) joint memo filed. revision petition stands disposed of in terms of the joint memo. after payment of the last installment as agreed in the joint memo, amount of rs.10,000/- imposed by the learned trial magistrate confirmed by the learned judge in the first appellate court towards defraying expenses of the state stands set-aside. it is made clear that, if there is any default in payment ofmoney as agreed in the joint memo, the conviction orderpassed by the learned trial magistrate confirmed by the learned judge in the first appellate court stands automatically restored. sd/- (v.srishananda) judge kcm list no.: 1 sl no.: 75

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.119 OF 2024 BETWEEN: KRISHNAPPA R., S/O RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.8, YESHASNILAYA 7th A MAIN, 7th CROSS, MEI LAYOUT, BAGALAGUNTE BENGALURU - 560 073. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. C R RAJA GOPAL.,ADVOCATE) AND: SHANKAR R., S/O RAMADS AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 76, 1st FLOOR, 8th CROSS, CHURCH ROAD, SBM COLONY,

Digitally      BRINDAVAN NAGAR,
signed by      BENGLAURU - 560 054.
MALATESH                                                 …RESPONDENT
KC          (BY SRI. SYED HUSSAIN, ADVOCATE FOR
Location:       SRI. VIRUPAKSHAIAH P H.,ADVOCATE)

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF CRL.A.No.130/2022 DATED 11.10.2023 BY THE LXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH-65, BENGALURU AND CONVICTION, SENTENCE AND FINE IMPOSED BY THE LEARNED XXII ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU VIDE

JUDGMENT DATED 15.11.2021 PASSED IN C.C.NO.14672/2018

AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT. -2- THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) Joint Memo filed. Revision Petition stands disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo. After payment of the last installment as agreed in the Joint Memo, amount of Rs.10,000/- imposed by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court towards defraying expenses of the State stands set-aside. It is made clear that, if there is any default in payment of

money as agreed in the Joint Memo, the conviction Order

passed by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court stands automatically restored. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 75

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial