Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.Usha Devi, vs State of Kerala,

S.Usha Devi, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 01, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1858860

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/3045/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Usha Devi,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....varkala,thiruvananthapuram-695 145 5 secretary to the government of kerala, general education department, secretariat, thiruvananthapuram 695 001 other present:smt. nisha bose sr.gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 01.02.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: wpc.3045/19 2judgmentthis matter is related to leave travel concession claimed by the petitioner. she approached the d.e.o, attingal, 3 rd respondent. the d.e.o vide ext.p7 directed the headmistress of that school, 4 th respondent, to pass orders.2. in the light of ext.p7, necessary orders shall be passed by the 4 threspondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. the petitioner shall serve a copy of this judgment along with the writ petition both the d.e.o and the headmistress. the writ petition is disposed of as above. sd/- a.muhamed mustaque judge wpc.3045/19 3 appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: exhibit p1 a true copy of go(p) no 5/2013/fin dated 2.1.2013 exhibit p2 a true copy of the letter by the petitioner to respondent no 3 dated 24.4.2-18 exhibit p3 a true copy of the application before respondent no 4 for ltc dated 20.6.2018 exhibit p4 a true copy of the letter issued by respondent no 3 to respondent no 4 dated 26.7.2018 exhibit p5 a true copy of the letter by respondent no 4 dated 19.9.2018 denying consideration of exhibit p4 exhibit p6 a true copy of the letter by the petitioner to respondent no 3 dated 23.10.2018 exhibit p7 a true copy of the letter by respondent no 3 to respondent no 4 dated 2.11.2018 exhibit p8 a true copy of the letter by petitioner to respondent no 2 dated 18.12.2018 true copy cl p.s to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY ,THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 12TH MAGHA, 1940 WP(C).No. 3045 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: S.USHA DEVI, AGED 56 YEARS W/O CHANDRASENAN K.V, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, SIVAGIRI HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,VARKALA,RESIDING AT PADIVAVILAS, SREENIVASAPURAM P.O.VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 145.

BY ADVS. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF SMT.MINU BABU SMT.SHAIMA VAHAB SRI.M.H.ASIF ALI SRI.T.SAILESH KUMAR RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, JAGATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 3 DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 101 4 S.PRASANNAKUMARI, HEAD MISTRESS, SIVAGIRI HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VARKALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 145 5 SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 OTHER PRESENT:SMT. NISHA BOSE SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.3045/19 2

JUDGMENT

This matter is related to Leave Travel Concession claimed by the petitioner. She approached the D.E.O, Attingal, 3 rd respondent. The D.E.O vide Ext.P7 directed the Headmistress of that school, 4 th respondent, to pass orders.

2. In the light of Ext.P7, necessary orders shall be passed by the 4 th

respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall serve a copy of this judgment along with the writ petition both the D.E.O and the Headmistress. The writ petition is disposed of as above. SD/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE WPC.3045/19 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF GO(P) NO 5/2013/FIN DATED 2.1.2013 EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER BY THE PETITIONER TO RESPONDENT NO 3 DATED 24.4.2-18 EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION BEFORE RESPONDENT NO 4 FOR LTC DATED 20.6.2018 EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO 3 TO RESPONDENT NO 4 DATED 26.7.2018 EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER BY RESPONDENT NO 4 DATED 19.9.2018 DENYING CONSIDERATION OF EXHIBIT P4 EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER BY THE PETITIONER TO RESPONDENT NO 3 DATED 23.10.2018 EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER BY RESPONDENT NO 3 TO RESPONDENT NO 4 DATED 2.11.2018 EXHIBIT P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER BY PETITIONER TO RESPONDENT NO 2 DATED 18.12.2018 TRUE COPY CL P.S TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial