Full Judgment
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1313 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN:
1. V RANGANATHAN AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS RK TOWNSHIP, YARANDAHALLI, JIGANI ROAD, BANGALORE 560 105.
2. SRI. R. SRIRAM AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O. SRI. V RANGANATHAN, Digitally
signed by RK TOWNSHIP, MEGHA YARANDAHALLI, MOHAN JIGANI ROAD,Location: HIGH COURT BANGALORE 560 105. OF …APPELLANTS KARNATAKA (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1. B V KIRAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS -2-
2. SRI. B V AURN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 71, GANAPATHY TEMPLE BUILDING, BEGUR ROAD, BOMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE 560068. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.S.G. LOKESH., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(d) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 04.11.2019 PASSED IN MISC.PETITION NO.915/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIX ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-40), DISMISSING IA NO.1 FILED U/S.5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT, CONSEQUENTLY DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER U/O.9 RULE 13 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC AS BARRED BY LIMITATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the parties have settled the dispute out of the Court. Memo is taken on record. -3-
2. Accordingly, the appea is 'dismissed' as withdrawn.
3. Pending I.As, if any, shall stand disposed of. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SA