Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A P Gopikrishna vs the Additional Commissioner of Transport and Secretary

A P Gopikrishna vs The Additional Commissioner of Transport and Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 29, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1857471

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/733/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A P Gopikrishna

Respondent

The Additional Commissioner of Transport and Secretary

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 29th day of february, 2024 before the hon'ble mr. justice hemant chandangoudar writ petition no.733 of 2022 (mv) between:1. sri. a.p. gopikrishna, s/o. late ponnuranga mudaliar, aged about 57 years, prop: bharathi motor service, no.19-9-7, b-4, kennedy nagar, tirupathi, chittoor district. …petitioner digitally signed by b (by sri. a.s. parasara kumar, adv.,) k mahendrakumar location: high and: court of karnataka1. the additional commissioner of transport and secretary, state transport authority, 1st floor, bmtc ttmc building, k.h.road, shanthinagar, bangalore-560 0207.2. sri. b.v. ashok, s/o. b.g.venkatesh, prop: sri venkateshwara motor service, no.9/a, race course road, bangalore-560 001. …respondents (by sri. b. ravindranath, aga for r1)this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, praying to call for records. quash the impugned order passed by the tribunal in appeal no.44/2021 dated 16.9.2021 in so -2- far it relates to permitting the r-2 to operate the service with the impugned timings dated 20.3.2021 till fresh timings are assigned by the r-1 while rightly remanding the matter for reassignment of timings vide anenxure-h & etc. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:order1. learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memostating that during the pendency of the petition, the first respondent has revised the time and therefore, relief sought for in this petition does not survive for consideration.2. memo is placed on record.3. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/- judge abk list no.: 1 sl no.: 14

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO.733 OF 2022 (MV) BETWEEN:

1. SRI. A.P. GOPIKRISHNA, S/O. LATE PONNURANGA MUDALIAR, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, PROP: BHARATHI MOTOR SERVICE, NO.19-9-7, B-4, KENNEDY NAGAR, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. …PETITIONER Digitally signed by B (BY SRI. A.S. PARASARA KUMAR, ADV.,) K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH AND: COURT OF KARNATAKA

1. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT AND SECRETARY, STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, 1ST FLOOR, BMTC TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 0207.

2. SRI. B.V. ASHOK, S/O. B.G.VENKATESH, PROP: SRI VENKATESHWARA MOTOR SERVICE, NO.9/A, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS. QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN APPEAL NO.44/2021 DATED 16.9.2021 IN SO -2- FAR IT RELATES TO PERMITTING THE R-2 TO OPERATE THE SERVICE WITH THE IMPUGNED TIMINGS DATED 20.3.2021 TILL FRESH TIMINGS ARE ASSIGNED BY THE R-1 WHILE RIGHTLY REMANDING THE MATTER FOR REASSIGNMENT OF TIMINGS VIDE ANENXURE-H & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo

stating that during the pendency of the petition, the first respondent has revised the time and therefore, relief sought for in this petition does not survive for consideration.

2. Memo is placed on record.

3. Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial