Thomas Mathew vs Sunilkumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 02, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1857444

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1857444
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr. Justice a.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar
Decided On: Aug 02, 2019
Case Number: Con.Case(C)/895/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thomas Mathew

Respondent

Sunilkumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.k.jayasankaran nambiar friday, the 02nd day of august 2019/11th sravana, 1941 con.case(c).no.895 of 2018 in w.p(c).no.13607/2018 against the judgment in w.p(c).no.13607/2018 of high court of kerala dated 13-04-2018 petitioner/petitioner:thomas mathew aged 65 years, s/o.late ummen mathew, hill view, pulamon p.o., kottarakkara, kollam district. by adv. sri.i.dinesh menon respondent/4th respondent in the w.p.: sunilkumar secretary, kottarakkara nagara sabha, pulamon p.o., kottarakkara-691506. (father's name and age is not known to the petitioner). by adv. sri.m.k.chandramohan das, sc, kottarakkara municipality by sri.dhruv kumar.k representing sc sri.m.k.chandramohan das this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 02.08.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: cont. case ©.no.895/2018 : 2 :a.k.jayasankaran nambiar, j.------------------------------- cont. case (c).no.895 of 2018 ----------------------------------- dated this the 2nd day of august, 2019judgmentit is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent municipality that a final adjudication on ext.p10 notice can be done only after obtaining a report from the tahsildar, as regards the measurement of the land. it is stated that the petitioner has been informed that no coercive action would be taken against him before such adjudication is done. taking note of the said submission on behalf of the respondent municipality, this contempt case is closed. sd/- a.k.jayasankaran nambiar judge prp/2/8/19 cont. case ©.no.895/2018 : 3 : appendix petitioner's exhibits: annexure a1 true copy of the judgment in w.p(c).no.13607/2018 dated 13.4.2018. annexure a2 true copy of the preliminary objected dated 24.4.2018. annexure a3 true copy of the postal receipt dated 26.4.2018. respondents exhibits: nil. //true copy// p.s. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF AUGUST 2019/11TH SRAVANA, 1941 Con.Case(C).NO.895 OF 2018 IN W.P(C).NO.13607/2018 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C).NO.13607/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 13-04-2018 PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
THOMAS MATHEW AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.LATE UMMEN MATHEW, HILL VIEW, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT IN THE W.P.: SUNILKUMAR SECRETARY, KOTTARAKKARA NAGARA SABHA, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA-691506. (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC, KOTTARAKKARA MUNICIPALITY BY SRI.DHRUV KUMAR.K REPRESENTING SC SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.08.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Cont. Case ©.No.895/2018 : 2 :
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
------------------------------- Cont. Case (C).NO.895 OF 2018 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2019

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent Municipality that a final adjudication on Ext.P10 notice can be done only after obtaining a report from the Tahsildar, as regards the measurement of the land. It is stated that the petitioner has been informed that no coercive action would be taken against him before such adjudication is done. Taking note of the said submission on behalf of the respondent Municipality, this Contempt Case is closed. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp/2/8/19 Cont. Case ©.No.895/2018 : 3 : APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C).NO.13607/2018 DATED 13.4.2018. ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTED DATED 24.4.2018. ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 26.4.2018. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2019 Same Parties Thomas Mathew vs Sunilkumar Same Judge Honourable Dr. Justice a.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar