Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vikram vs the State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Vikram vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 07, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1856926

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/6842/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vikram

Respondent

The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

inin the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 07.04.2025 the honourable mr justice sunder mohan in 1.vikram 2.chellapandi3. harihara sudhan ...petitioners/a1 to a3vs the state rep by, the inspector of police, crime no.23 of 2025. ...respondent/complainant for petitioner (s): p.thinesh for respondent(s): mr.s.balaji government advocate (crl.side) page no.1 of 4 inorderthis petition has been filed to relax the condition of the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders imposed in crl.o.p.no.5209 of 2025 dated 26.02.2025.2. learned government advocate (crl.side) submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the condition regularly imposed by this court.3. considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of the offence, the condition in paragraph no.7(b) imposed on the petitioners in crl.o.p.no.5209 of 2025 dated 26.02.2025 is relaxed.4. accordingly, the criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. dk page no.2 of 4 in to 1.the inspector of police,2. the public prosecutor, high court of madras, chennai - 600 104. page no.3 of 4 insunder mohan, j.dk crl mp no. 6842 of 2025 in page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

in

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.04.2025 THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in 1.Vikram 2.Chellapandi

3. Harihara Sudhan ...Petitioners/A1 to A3

Vs The State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Crime No.23 of 2025. ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner (s): P.Thinesh For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Page No.1 of 4 in

ORDER

This petition has been filed to relax the condition of the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders imposed in Crl.O.P.No.5209 of 2025 dated 26.02.2025.

2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court.

3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of the offence, the condition in paragraph no.7(b) imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.5209 of 2025 dated 26.02.2025 is relaxed.

4. Accordingly, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. dk Page No.2 of 4 in To 1.The Inspector of Police,

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai - 600 104. Page No.3 of 4 in

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

dk CRL MP NO. 6842 of 2025 in Page No.4 of 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial