Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Francis, vs Silva,

Francis, vs SILVA,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 30, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1856837

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/214/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Francis,

Respondent

SILVA,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice alexander thomas thursday, the 30th day of may 2019 / 9th jyaishta, 1941 con.case(c).no. 214 of 2019 in wp(c). 13781/2018 against the judgment in wp(c) 13781/2018 of highcourt petitioners/petitioners: 1 francis,aged 31 years s/o eranimos, 2 dalini,aged 21 years w/o francis eranimos, by adv. sri.k.v.anil kumar respondents/respondents 1 & 2 in w.p.(c): 1 silva, s/o gilbert, pin- 695 304. 2 baby, w/o silva, thiruvananthapuram. pin - 695 304.this contempt of court case (civil) having been finally heard on 30.05.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following:alexander thomas, j.====================== con.case(c) no.214/2019 in wp(c) no.13781/2018 ============================ dated this the 30th day of may, 2019judgmentin view of the directions issued today (30.05.2019) by this court in w.p.(c) no.13781 of 2018, this court does not propose to entertain the contempt case any further. petitioners may file formal application before the maintenance tribunal as afore stated seeking for directions to get respondents 1 and 2 vacated from the residential premises of the petitioners, as already ordered herein above. in the light of these aspects further proceedings in the con.case are closed and accordingly the con.case will disposed of. sd/- alexander thomas judge mpm appendix petitioners'exhibits: annexure -a1 certified copy of judgment dated 13.09.2018 in writ petition (civil) no. annexure - a2 a true copy of the complaint dated 30.09.2018 and its receipt before the station house officer, anchuthengu police station. annexure -a3 a true copy of the notice dated 15.11.2018 sent to the 1st respondent. annexure - a4 a true copy of the notice dated 15.11.2018 sent to the 2nd respondent. annexure -a5 a true copy of the postal acknowledgment signed by the 1st respondent. annexure - a6 a true copy of the postal acknowledgment signed by the 2nd respondent. // tue copy // p.a.to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 9TH JYAISHTA, 1941 Con.Case(C).No. 214 of 2019 IN WP(C). 13781/2018 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 13781/2018 of HIGHCOURT PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: 1 FRANCIS,AGED 31 YEARS S/O ERANIMOS, 2 DALINI,AGED 21 YEARS W/O FRANCIS ERANIMOS, BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN W.P.(C): 1 SILVA, S/O GILBERT, PIN- 695 304. 2 BABY, W/O SILVA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN - 695 304.

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.05.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

====================== Con.Case(C) No.214/2019 in WP(C) No.13781/2018 ============================ Dated this the 30th day of May, 2019

JUDGMENT

In view of the directions issued today (30.05.2019) by this Court in W.P.(C) No.13781 of 2018, this Court does not propose to entertain the Contempt Case any further. Petitioners may file formal application before the Maintenance Tribunal as afore stated seeking for directions to get respondents 1 and 2 vacated from the residential premises of the petitioners, as already ordered herein above. In the light of these aspects further proceedings in the Con.Case are closed and accordingly the Con.Case will disposed of. Sd/- ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE mpm APPENDIX PETITIONERS'EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE -A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 13.09.2018 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. ANNEXURE - A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 30.09.2018 AND ITS RECEIPT BEFORE THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANCHUTHENGU POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE -A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 15.11.2018 SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE - A4 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 15.11.2018 SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE -A5 A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT SIGNED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE - A6 A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT SIGNED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. // Tue Copy // P.A.to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial