Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajith Salim, vs the Branch Manager,

Ajith Salim, vs The Branch Manager,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 31, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1856584

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/2445/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajith Salim,

Respondent

The Branch Manager,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran thursday ,the 31st day of january 2019 / 11th magha, 1940 wp(c).no. 2445 of 2019 petitioner/s: ajith salim, aged 34 years s/o gigi salim,vazhayila, peroorkada.p.o, thiruvananthapuram-695005. sri.praveen k. joy smt.beena joseph smt.m.r.eshrath bai sri.e.s.saneej sri.n.abhilash sri.n.b.anoop respondent/s: 1 the branch manager, city union bank,trivandrum branch, trivandrum district-695035. 2 the authorised officer, city union bank,administrative office, no 24b,gandhinagar,kumbakonam-612001. 3 m/s.jeyam enterprises, baleswari,h.no.64,subash nagar, perunthani,trivandrum-695008, represented by m.s.r.sukumaran, s/o ramankrishna reddiar. sri.n.sasi sri.p.balakrishnan this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 31.01.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: wpc 2445/19judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner prays that this writ petition be allowed to be withdrawn, since the bank has already considered ext.p7 application, which is the only prayer made in this writ petition. he prays that his client may be permitted to approach the bank for a settlement in terms of law. in the afore circumstances, i allow the petitioner to withdraw this writ petition. consequently, this writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn, reserving liberty to him to approach the bank in any manner that he may choose for settlement of the account, which shall be considered by the bank subject to their discretion. sd/- devan ramachandran rr judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THURSDAY ,THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 11TH MAGHA, 1940 WP(C).No. 2445 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: AJITH SALIM, AGED 34 YEARS S/O GIGI SALIM,VAZHAYILA, PEROORKADA.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695005. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SMT.BEENA JOSEPH SMT.M.R.ESHRATH BAI SRI.E.S.SANEEJ SRI.N.ABHILASH SRI.N.B.ANOOP RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE BRANCH MANAGER, CITY UNION BANK,TRIVANDRUM BRANCH, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT-695035. 2 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, CITY UNION BANK,ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, NO 24B,GANDHINAGAR,KUMBAKONAM-612001. 3 M/S.JEYAM ENTERPRISES, BALESWARI,H.NO.64,SUBASH NAGAR, PERUNTHANI,TRIVANDRUM-695008, REPRESENTED BY M.S.R.SUKUMARAN, S/O RAMANKRISHNA REDDIAR. SRI.N.SASI SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 2445/19

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner prays that this writ petition be allowed to be withdrawn, since the Bank has already considered Ext.P7 application, which is the only prayer made in this writ petition. He prays that his client may be permitted to approach the Bank for a settlement in terms of law. In the afore circumstances, I allow the petitioner to withdraw this writ petition. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn, reserving liberty to him to approach the Bank in any manner that he may choose for settlement of the account, which shall be considered by the Bank subject to their discretion. SD/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN RR JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial