Dilipa vs the State of Karnataka

Dilipa vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 01, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1856313

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1856313
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Mohammad Nawaz
Decided On: Feb 01, 2024
Case Number: CRL.P/209/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dilipa

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....high high court of karnataka, court of bangalore 01.karnataka2. smt. radhaw/o venkatesh, aged about 42 years, r/at, kyathanahalli colony hassan, n/o. prema nagara, sakleshpura town, hassan - 573215. …respondents (by sri. k nageshwarappa.,hcgp) -2- this crl.p is filed u/s.439 cr.p.c praying toenlarge the petitioner on bail in spl.case no.397/2023 (cr.no.99/2023) of alur p.s., hassan district for the offence p/u/s 376(2)(n) of ipc and sec.5(j), 5(l), 4, 6 of pocso act and sec.9 of prohibition of child marriage act on the file of the addl. district and sessions judge ftsc-1 at hasan and pending on the file of the addl. district and sessions judge, ftsc-1, hassan.this petition, coming on for order, this day, the court made the following:orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of the court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition before the sessions court after the evidence of the victim girl is recorded.2. in the light of the above submission, petition isdismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition under section 439 of cr.p.c. before the sessions court / trial court after completion of victim's evidence.3. considering that the charge sheet is already filedand the petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.09.2023, the -3- learned sessions judge is requested to expedite the recording of the victim's evidence. sd/- judge ldc list no.: 1 sl no.: 51

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 209 OF 2024 BETWEEN: DILIPA S/O LATE LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/AT, GUNDASHETTIHALLI VILLAGE, SALAGAME HOBLI, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573215. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRATHEEP K C.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ALUR POLICE STATION, HASSAN DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS Digitally signed
by V KRISHNA             STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Location: High           HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
Court of                 BANGALORE 01.
Karnataka
2. SMT. RADHA
W/O VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT, KYATHANAHALLI COLONY HASSAN, N/O. PREMA NAGARA, SAKLESHPURA TOWN, HASSAN - 573215. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K NAGESHWARAPPA.,HCGP) -2- THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO

ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN SPL.CASE NO.397/2023 (CR.NO.99/2023) OF ALUR P.S., HASSAN DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 376(2)(n) OF IPC AND SEC.5(j), 5(l), 4, 6 OF POCSO ACT AND SEC.9 OF PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FTSC-1 AT HASAN AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-1, HASSAN.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDER, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of the Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition before the Sessions Court after the evidence of the victim girl is recorded.

2. In the light of the above submission, petition is

dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. before the Sessions Court / Trial Court after completion of victim's evidence.

3. Considering that the charge sheet is already filed

and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.09.2023, the -3- learned Sessions Judge is requested to expedite the recording of the victim's evidence. Sd/- JUDGE LDC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Dilipa vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge Mohammad Nawaz