Anusha vs the State of Karnataka

Anusha vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 01, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1855997

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1855997
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Sachin Shankar Magadum
Decided On: Feb 01, 2024
Case Number: CRL.P/2540/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anusha

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of february, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice sachin shankar magadum criminal petition no. 2540 of 2020 between:1. anushad/o late puttaswamy aged 17 years, (rep by minor guardian her mother) smt.nagamani w/o late d.puttaswamy, aged 36 years, r/at h hosur village, ca kere hobli, maddur mandya taluk, karnataka-573 124.2. prajwal s/o nagaraju h d aged about 19 years digitally signed bychaithra a 3. ujwal location: s/o nagaraju h d, high aged about 17 years court of (rep by minor guardian his father)karnataka sri nagaraju h.d. s/o late bokkegowda, aged 48 years, above 2 & 3 are r/at h hosuru village, c a kere hobli, maddur mandya taluk, karnataka-573124 …petitioners (by sri. jagadeesha h, advocate) -2- and:1. the state of karnataka by k.m.doddi police station mandya, rep by state public prosecutor high court complex, bangalore-560 001.2. smt.thayamma @ kempamma w/o late muddalingegowda, major in age, r/at h hosur village, c.a. kere hobli, maddur taluk, mandya district-573125. …respondents (by sri.m.r.patil, hcgp for r1) this crl.p is filed u/s.482 of cr.p.c by theadvocate for the petitioner praying to quash the fir registered against the respondent in cr.no.168/2019 k.m.doddy police station dated 19.07.2019 for the alleged offence p/u/s.143,504,323,354,327,506 r/w 149 of ipc, pending on the file of the court of the addl. civil judge and jmfc, maddur. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:orderlearned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the criminal petition. -3- memo is taken on record. in view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- judge ca list no.: 2 sl no.: 28

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2540 OF 2020 BETWEEN:
1. ANUSHA
D/O LATE PUTTASWAMY AGED 17 YEARS, (REP BY MINOR GUARDIAN HER MOTHER) SMT.NAGAMANI W/O LATE D.PUTTASWAMY, AGED 36 YEARS, R/AT H HOSUR VILLAGE, CA KERE HOBLI, MADDUR MANDYA TALUK, KARNATAKA-573 124.
2. PRAJWAL S/O NAGARAJU H D AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS Digitally signed by
CHAITHRA A   3.    UJWAL
Location:          S/O NAGARAJU H D,
HIGH               AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS
COURT OF           (REP BY MINOR GUARDIAN HIS FATHER)
KARNATAKA SRI NAGARAJU H.D. S/O LATE BOKKEGOWDA, AGED 48 YEARS, ABOVE 2 & 3 ARE R/AT H HOSURU VILLAGE, C A KERE HOBLI, MADDUR MANDYA TALUK, KARNATAKA-573124 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JAGADEESHA H, ADVOCATE) -2- AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY K.M.DODDI POLICE STATION MANDYA, REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. SMT.THAYAMMA @ KEMPAMMA W/O LATE MUDDALINGEGOWDA, MAJOR IN AGE, R/AT H HOSUR VILLAGE, C.A. KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-573125. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.R.PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C BY THE
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR REGISTERED AGAINST THE RESPONDENT IN CR.NO.168/2019 K.M.DODDY POLICE STATION DATED 19.07.2019 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S.143,504,323,354,327,506 R/W 149 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADDUR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the criminal petition. -3- Memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE CA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 28

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Anusha vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge Sachin Shankar Magadum