Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kalegowda vs Javaraiah

Kalegowda vs Javaraiah

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Dec 02, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1855224

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA/1698/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kalegowda

Respondent

Javaraiah

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 2nd day of december, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice n s sanjay gowda miscellaneous first appeal no.1698 of 2020(mv-i) between:1. kalegowdas/o. marigowda aged about 69 years kandahalli post, hassan taluk …appellant (by sri girish b. baladare, advocate) digitally signed and: by kiran kumar r location: 1. javaraiah high court s/o. kalaiah of karnataka aged about 79 years r/at sanyasipura village k. r. nagar taluk mysuru district - 570 0012. reliance general insurance corporate office 570 naidaum cross road next to royal industrial estate wadala (w) mumbai - 400 031 -2-3. t. d. basavegowdas/o. devegowda aged about 45 years kandahalli post hassan taluk …respondents (by sri d. vijaya kumar, advocate for r-2; vide order dated 25/11/2024, notice to r-3 is dispensed with) this mfa is filed under section 173(1) of mv act, against the judgment and award dated 20.03.2012 passed in mvc no.214/2011 on the presiding officer, fast track court-v, mysuru, awarding compensation of rs.53,600/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization. this mfa, coming on for orders, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice n s sanjay gowda -3-oral judgment1. the memo is filed by the claimant seeking forwithdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties out of the court and a memo is also filed by the decree holder/claimant stating that the execution petition is closed.2. in view of the above, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and the amount of rs.25,000/- deposited by the appellant shall be refunded to it. sd/- (n s sanjay gowda) judge gsr list no.: 1 sl no.: 11

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1698 OF 2020(MV-I) BETWEEN:

1. KALEGOWDA

S/O. MARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS KANDAHALLI POST, HASSAN TALUK …APPELLANT (BY SRI GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed AND: by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: 1. JAVARAIAH HIGH COURT S/O. KALAIAH OF KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS R/AT SANYASIPURA VILLAGE K. R. NAGAR TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 001

2. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATE OFFICE 570 NAIDAUM CROSS ROAD NEXT TO ROYAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE WADALA (W) MUMBAI - 400 031 -2-

3. T. D. BASAVEGOWDA

S/O. DEVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS KANDAHALLI POST HASSAN TALUK …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI D. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2; VIDE ORDER DATED 25/11/2024, NOTICE TO R-3 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.03.2012 PASSED IN MVC NO.214/2011 ON THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-V, MYSURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.53,600/- WITH INTEREST AT 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL REALIZATION. THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA -3-

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The memo is filed by the claimant seeking for

withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties out of the Court and a memo is also filed by the decree holder/claimant stating that the execution petition is closed.

2. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and the amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited by the appellant shall be refunded to it. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial