Full Judgment
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2015 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1525 OF 2012 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 142/2004 BETWEEN:
1. SRI. ANIL DEV S/O. SRI. B. L. DEV
2. SMT. ALKA DEV
W/O. SRI. ANIL DEV Digitally signed …APPLICANTS by NARAYANAPPA (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR.P & LAKSHMAMMA SMT. VIJETHA R. NAIK.,ADVOCATES) Location: HIGH COURT OF AND: KARNATAKA
1. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF:
M/S. S. N. FINANCE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CORPORATE BHAVAN, NO.26-27, 12TH FLOOR RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G. ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. SRI. A.S. PATTABIRAMAN NO.607A, 1ST MAIN ROAD 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 010. -2-
3. SRI. B.R. MADHUSUDHAN NO.584, 6TH CROSS, NGEF LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI
4. SRI. B.R. SRINIVASA PRASAD NO.584, 6TH CROSS, NGEF LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI
5. SRI. V.R. GUNDANNAVAR, EX-DIRECTOR NO.3062, 11TH CROSS. 11TH MAIN HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR,
6. SRI. G. H. PATIL EX-DIRECTOR NO.740, "MATHRU KRUPA" INDIRA COLONY, KESHWAPUR HUBLI - 580 023.
7. SRI. S. HARIKRISHNA EX-DIRECTOR "SRI LAKSHMI", #4000, 100 FT ROAD, HAL 2ND STAGE INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 008.
8. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE INDIRANAGAR POLICE STATION …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHRISHAIL NAVALGUND .,ADVOCATE FOR OL) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER COMPANIES
ACT, 1956 R/W RULE 6 & 9 OF COMPANY COURT RULES UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ACCOMPANYING APPLICATION AND PERMIT THE APPLICANTS TO TAKE UP MEASURES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ALTERATIONS, RENOVATION, ADDITIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SAID BUILDING AND FURTHER BONAFIDE USE OF THE SAME IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. -3- THIS COMPANY APPLICATION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. CA No.66/2015 has been filed seeking for permission to respondents No.4 and 5 to take up measures to carry out alternation, renovation and additional maintenance of the building.
2. In view of the dismissal of the application in CA
No.1525/2012 confirming the same. Respondents No.4 and 5, being the owners of the said property, would be free to deal with said property in the any manner they deem fit. As such, CA No.66/2015 does not survive for consideration, stands dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE SR List No.: Sl No.: