Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Siju, vs State of Kerala,

SIJU, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 22, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1854200

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.Rev.Pet/104/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SIJU,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice raja vijayaraghavan v tuesday, the 22nd day of january 2019 / 2nd magha, 1940 crl.rev.pet.no. 104 of 2019 against the order/judgment in sc 941/2017 of special court (atrocities against sc/st), manjeri crime no. 111/2017 of pothukal police station, malappuram revision petitioner/s:siju, aged 36 years, s/o. narayanan, kakkanad house, illippady, pathirippadam p.o., malappuram district - 679302. by advs. sri.k.mohanakannan smt.t.v.neema respondent/s: state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam - 682011. other present: sri. b. jayasurya pp. this criminal revision petition having come up for admission on 22.01.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: crlr.p.104 of 2019 2orderinstead of preferring an appeal under section 374 of the cr.p.c., the petitioner has ventured to file a revision petition.2. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw this revision petition in order to prefer an appeal. this revision petition is dismissed. registry is directed to return back the order passed by the learned sessions judge to enable the petitioner to prefer an appeal. sd/- raja vijayaraghavan v., judge krj //true copy// p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 2ND MAGHA, 1940 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 104 of 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 941/2017 of SPECIAL COURT (ATROCITIES AGAINST SC/ST), MANJERI CRIME NO. 111/2017 OF POTHUKAL POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM REVISION PETITIONER/S:

SIJU, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANAN, KAKKANAD HOUSE, ILLIPPADY, PATHIRIPPADAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679302. BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.T.V.NEEMA RESPONDENT/S: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682011. OTHER PRESENT: SRI. B. JAYASURYA PP. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRLR.P.104 OF 2019 2

ORDER

Instead of preferring an appeal under Section 374 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner has ventured to file a revision petition.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks

permission to withdraw this revision petition in order to prefer an appeal. This revision petition is dismissed. Registry is directed to return back the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge to enable the petitioner to prefer an appeal. SD/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., JUDGE krj //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial