Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Murukan vs State of Kerala

Murukan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 09, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1853927

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./4742/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Murukan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

wednesday, the 09th day of january 2019 / 19th pousha, 1940 bail appl..no. 8793 of 2018 crime no. 2/2018 of anthikkad excise range office, thrissur murukan, aged 37 years, s/o.mokkai, chinnamannoor desom, chinnammannoor village, uttamapalaym taluk, other present: this bail application having come up for admission on 09.01.2019, along with bail appl..4742/2018, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a.8793 & 4742/2018 2 wednesday,the 09th day of january 2019 / 19th pousha, 1940 bail appl..no. 4742 of 2018 crime no. 7/2013 of kunnamkulam excise range office, thrissur murukan, aged 37, s/o. mokkai, chinnamannoor desom, chinnammannoor village, uttamapalayam taluk, sri.rafeek. v.k. sri.vishnu bhuvanendran this bail application having come up for admission on 09.01.2019, along with bail appl..8793/2018, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a.8793 & 4742/2018 3orderwhen these matters were taken up, sri.saijo hassan, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw these applications without prejudice to right of the applicant to move the sessions court for appropriate orders. reserving such right, these applications are dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- raja vijayaraghavan v., judge krj //true copy// p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

WEDNESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 19TH POUSHA, 1940 Bail Appl..No. 8793 of 2018 CRIME NO. 2/2018 OF ANTHIKKAD EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, Thrissur MURUKAN, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.MOKKAI, CHINNAMANNOOR DESOM, CHINNAMMANNOOR VILLAGE, UTTAMAPALAYM TALUK, OTHER PRESENT: THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.01.2019, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..4742/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.8793 & 4742/2018 2 WEDNESDAY,THE 09TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 19TH POUSHA, 1940 Bail Appl..No. 4742 of 2018 CRIME NO. 7/2013 OF Kunnamkulam Excise Range Office, Thrissur MURUKAN, AGED 37, S/O. MOKKAI, CHINNAMANNOOR DESOM, CHINNAMMANNOOR VILLAGE, UTTAMAPALAYAM TALUK, SRI.RAFEEK. V.K. SRI.VISHNU BHUVANENDRAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.01.2019, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..8793/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.8793 & 4742/2018 3

ORDER

When these matters were taken up, Sri.Saijo Hassan, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw these applications without prejudice to right of the applicant to move the Sessions Court for appropriate orders. Reserving such right, these applications are dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., JUDGE krj //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial