Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

K.Sivaprakash Vs Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

K.Sivaprakash vs Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 02, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1853896

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/9663/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Sivaprakash

Respondent

Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 02-09-2025coramthe honourable mr.justice t. vinod kumar wmp.nos.10280, 10281, 10282, 10277, 10278 & 10279 of 20191. k.sivaprakashs/o. t.kalimuthu, no. 123/ 6b, raja nagar extension, ellis nagar, dharapuram - 638656 chennai petitioner in wp.9663/2019 m. induja, d/o.k.meenakshi sundaram, no.33, lakshmi nagar, vanagaram, chennai 600 095. petitioner in wp.9665/2019 vs1. tamil nadu pollution control boardrespondent(s) prayer writ petition filed under art.226 of the constitution of india praying for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned notification dated 06.03.2019 in no. 1/ 2019 of the respondent in so far as its fails to consider the petitioners with basic qualifications i.e. b.techin energy and environmental engineering and b.tech in biotechnology for appointment as assistant engineer and quash the same and for direction, directing the respondent to consider the petitioners for appointment to the post of assistant engineer in the respondent board. for petitioner(s): mr. j. raja rao, in both wps for mr.r.saravanakumar for respondent(s): m/s madhuri donti reddy in both wpsordermr.g.vijay, learned counsel representing mr.r.krishnaswamy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petitions does not survive for consideration by this court and thus, the writ petitions have become infructuous. the learned counsel for the petitioners has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundles.2. recording the same, these writ petitions are closed as infructuous. nocosts. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. msr 02-09-2025 index:yes/no internet:yes to tamil nadu pollution control board t.vinod kumar j. msr wmp.nos.10280, 10281, 10282, 10277, 10278 & 10279 of 2019 02-09-2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WMP.Nos.10280, 10281, 10282, 10277, 10278 & 10279 of 2019

1. K.Sivaprakash

S/o. T.Kalimuthu, No. 123/ 6B, Raja Nagar Extension, Ellis Nagar, Dharapuram - 638656 Chennai Petitioner in WP.9663/2019 M. Induja, D/o.K.Meenakshi Sundaram, No.33, Lakshmi Nagar, Vanagaram, Chennai 600 095. Petitioner in WP.9665/2019 Vs

1. Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Art.226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned notification dated 06.03.2019 in No. 1/ 2019 of the respondent in so far as its fails to consider the petitioners with basic qualifications i.e. B.Tech

in Energy and Environmental Engineering and B.Tech in Biotechnology for appointment as Assistant Engineer and quash the same and for direction, directing the respondent to consider the petitioners for appointment to the post of Assistant Engineer in the respondent board. For Petitioner(s): Mr. J. Raja Rao, in both WPs for Mr.R.Saravanakumar For Respondent(s): M/s Madhuri Donti Reddy in both WPs

ORDER

Mr.G.Vijay, learned counsel representing Mr.R.Krishnaswamy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petitions does not survive for consideration by this Court and thus, the writ petitions have become infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioners has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundles.

2. Recording the same, these writ petitions are closed as infructuous. No

costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. msr 02-09-2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes To Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board T.VINOD KUMAR J. msr WMP.Nos.10280, 10281, 10282, 10277, 10278 & 10279 of 2019 02-09-2025

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties K.Sivaprakash vs Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales