Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shivkumar vs the Divisional Controller

Shivkumar vs The Divisional Controller

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Kalaburagi Decided Dec 19, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1853697

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Kalaburagi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA/201328/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shivkumar

Respondent

The Divisional Controller

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka, kalaburagi bench dated this the 19th day of december, 2024 before the hon'ble mr. justice sachin shankar magadum miscl. first appeal no. 201328 of 2021 (mv-i) between:1. shivkumars/o omkar @ omkarayya age 06 years, occ student under guardianship of natural mother aruna w/o omakar @ omkarayya age 33 years, occu. labour r/o dongargaon now at shiv nagar, north bidar tq and dist bidar …appellant(by sri. sandeep vijaykumar, advocate) and: digitally signed by 1. the divisional controller al bhagya location: high nekrtc bidar division court of bidar 585401 karnatka …respondent (by sri. sharanabasappa m. patil, advocate)this mfa is filed u/s. 173(1) of mv act, praying to call for the records in mvc no. 632/2017 on the file of the addl. senior civil judge and addl. mact at bidar, to modify the judgment and award dated 01.04.2019 passed in mvc no. 632/2017 on the file court of the addl senior civil judge and addl mact at bidar and etc. -2-this appeal, coming on for orders, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice sachin shankar magadumoral judgment(per: hon'ble mr. justice sachin shankar magadum) heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/corporation.2. on reassessing the evidence on record, thiscourt is of the view that the claimant is asserting that he has suffered grievous head injuries and that has affected his earning capacity. there is absolutely no medical evidence to substantiate his claim. in the absence of medical evidence, tribunal has infact awarded reasonable and fair compensation of rs.50,000/-. there is no scope for enhancement.3. hence, the appeal is dismissed. sd/- (sachin shankar magadum) judge alb list no.: 1

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 201328 OF 2021 (MV-I) BETWEEN:

1. SHIVKUMAR

S/O OMKAR @ OMKARAYYA AGE 06 YEARS, OCC STUDENT UNDER GUARDIANSHIP OF NATURAL MOTHER ARUNA W/O OMAKAR @ OMKARAYYA AGE 33 YEARS, OCCU. LABOUR R/O DONGARGAON NOW AT SHIV NAGAR, NORTH BIDAR TQ AND DIST BIDAR …APPELLANT

(BY SRI. SANDEEP VIJAYKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by 1. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH NEKRTC BIDAR DIVISION COURT OF BIDAR 585401 KARNATKA …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHARANABASAPPA M. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S. 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN MVC NO. 632/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. MACT AT BIDAR, TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.04.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO. 632/2017 ON THE FILE COURT OF THE ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL MACT AT BIDAR AND ETC. -2-

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Corporation.

2. On reassessing the evidence on record, this

Court is of the view that the claimant is asserting that he has suffered grievous head injuries and that has affected his earning capacity. There is absolutely no medical evidence to substantiate his claim. In the absence of medical evidence, Tribunal has infact awarded reasonable and fair compensation of Rs.50,000/-. There is no scope for enhancement.

3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE ALB List No.: 1

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial