Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nagamma vs State of Karnataka and Anr

Nagamma vs State of Karnataka and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Dec 20, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1853662

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/203797/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nagamma

Respondent

State of Karnataka and Anr

Excerpt

.....the petitioner seeks parole on the ground that her son has been a life convict for over 2 years. the petitioner pleads that she is suffering from several ailments and desires that her son be with her.5. i have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the respective learned counsel and have perused the material on record. -4-6. the aforementioned facts are not in dispute andtherefore, requires no reiteration. the petitioner now seeks parole only on the ground that she is suffering from ailment and wants her son to be in the family. therefore, i deem it appropriate to grant the petitioner’s son general parole for a period of 30 days, which becomes operational from 23.12.2024 to 21.01.2025.7. in view of the aforesaid reasons, i pass the following:order(i) the writ petition is allowed-in-part.(ii) petitioner’s son - detenue (sanna urakundayya) (ctp no.13451) is granted general parole for a period of 30 days, which becomes operational from 23.12.2024 to 21.01.2025.(iii) the convict (ctp no. 13451) shall mark hisattendance in the jurisdictional police station weekly once throughout the period of his parole and it would be the responsibility of the jurisdictional police to take him to -5- gaol, in the event, the convict (ctp no. 13451) would evade going back to the gaol, after the expiry of the period of general parole.(iv) respondent no.2 shall stipulate strictconditions as are usually stipulated, to ensure return of the detenue to the gaol and that the convict shall not commit any other offence during the period of parole.(v) registry is directed to communicate thisorder to respondent no.2, by way of electronic mail,forthwith.(vi) the petitioner’s son is at liberty to seek extension of general parole, which shall be considered looking at the conduct of the convict, while he is out on parole. !() &! ! # ' % /0 1 %234 5 - 6 5-

Full Judgment

-1- ! " # $ # % ! ! ! # & # ' ! " # $ Digitally signed by SUMITRA % SHERIGAR Location: HIGH COURT OF % &' '' KARNATAKA % %% ' ! " $ % % & ( -2- " $ " $ " $ ) % * % % +' % % % % % % % %% % , " $ - - . % # " - . % # $ The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by

issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to respondent No.2 to consider her request for grant of release of her son on general parole for a period of 90 days, who is a life convict - CTP No.13451 in terms of the Prison Manual. -3-

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents.

3. The brief facts are as follows: The petitioner’s son commits a crime which ends up in

his conviction in S.C.No.138/2010. On the registration of a crime for the offences punishable under Sections 451, 376, 504, 506 r/w 34 of IPC, the petitioner’s son was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.

4. The petitioner’s son continues to be in prison and

is now in prison for the last 2 years. On all the aforesaid basis, the petitioner seeks parole on the ground that her son has been a life convict for over 2 years. The petitioner pleads that she is suffering from several ailments and desires that her son be with her.

5. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the respective learned counsel and have perused the material on record. -4-

6. The aforementioned facts are not in dispute and

therefore, requires no reiteration. The petitioner now seeks parole only on the ground that she is suffering from ailment and wants her son to be in the family. Therefore, I deem it appropriate to grant the petitioner’s son general parole for a period of 30 days, which becomes operational from 23.12.2024 to 21.01.2025.

7. In view of the aforesaid reasons, I pass the following:

ORDER

(i) The Writ Petition is allowed-in-part.

(ii) Petitioner’s son - detenue (Sanna Urakundayya) (CTP No.13451) is granted general parole for a period of 30 days, which becomes operational from 23.12.2024 to 21.01.2025.

(iii) The convict (CTP No. 13451) shall mark his

attendance in the jurisdictional police station weekly once throughout the period of his parole and it would be the responsibility of the jurisdictional police to take him to -5- gaol, in the event, the convict (CTP No. 13451) would evade going back to the gaol, after the expiry of the period of general parole.

(iv) Respondent No.2 shall stipulate strict

conditions as are usually stipulated, to ensure return of the detenue to the gaol and that the convict shall not commit any other offence during the period of parole.

(v) Registry is directed to communicate this

order to respondent No.2, by way of electronic mail,

forthwith.

(vi) The petitioner’s son is at liberty to seek extension of general parole, which shall be considered looking at the conduct of the convict, while he is out on parole. !() &! ! # ' % /0 1 %234 5 - 6 5-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial