Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Saneesh vs State of Kerala,

Saneesh vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1852636

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/502/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Saneesh

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice b.sudheendra kumar thursday ,the 31st day of january 2019 / 11th magha, 1940 against the order/judgment in sc 277/2015 of additional district court & sessions court - iv, pathanamthitta crime no. 237/2011 of pathanamthitta police station , pathanamthitta petitioner/s: saneesh aged 37 years s/o.sahadevan, residing at saneesh bhavan, vattamuruppel veetil, njakkunilam, vallokodu muri, vallikkodu village, pathanamthitta district. by advs. sri.k.n.radhakrishnan(thiruvalla) smt.robeka john respondent/s: state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam. other present: sri. hrithwik c. s sr pp this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 31.01.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: -2-orderwhen this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned public prosecutor, on instructions, has submitted that five witnesses have been already examined and the trial is going on.2. the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be granted exemption from personal appearance, as the petitioner is abroad.3. in view of the above submission, it is directedthat the personal appearance of the petitioner shall not be insisted upon by the court below, till his examination under section 313 cr.p.c. however, the petitioner shall be present before the court for his examination under section 313 cr.p.c.this criminal m.c. stands closed with the above direction. sd/-b.sudheendra kumar judge ani/ -3- appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: annexure 1 the copy of the final report in crime no.237/2011 of the pathanamthitta police station. annexure 2 the copy of the order in the criminal mc.1921 of 2011 dated 29.6.2011. annexure 3 the copy of passport of the petitioner along with the visa.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR THURSDAY ,THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 11TH MAGHA, 1940 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 277/2015 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT - IV, PATHANAMTHITTA CRIME NO. 237/2011 OF Pathanamthitta Police Station , Pathanamthitta PETITIONER/S: SANEESH AGED 37 YEARS S/O.SAHADEVAN, RESIDING AT SANEESH BHAVAN, VATTAMURUPPEL VEETIL, NJAKKUNILAM, VALLOKODU MURI, VALLIKKODU VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.K.N.RADHAKRISHNAN(THIRUVALLA) SMT.ROBEKA JOHN RESPONDENT/S: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. OTHER PRESENT: SRI. HRITHWIK C. S SR PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

ORDER

When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, has submitted that five witnesses have been already examined and the trial is going on.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be granted exemption from personal appearance, as the petitioner is abroad.

3. In view of the above submission, it is directed

that the personal appearance of the petitioner shall not be insisted upon by the court below, till his examination under Section 313 Cr.P.C. However, the petitioner shall be present before the court for his examination under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

This Criminal M.C. stands closed with the above direction. Sd/-B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR JUDGE ani/ -3- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE 1 THE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.237/2011 OF THE PATHANAMTHITTA POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE 2 THE COPY OF THE ORDER IN THE CRIMINAL MC.1921 OF 2011 DATED 29.6.2011. ANNEXURE 3 THE COPY OF PASSPORT OF THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH THE VISA.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial