Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Preethi vs Gireeshmani

Preethi vs Gireeshmani

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 26, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1851166

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (FC)/54/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Preethi

Respondent

Gireeshmani

Excerpt

.....s/o.late c.j.mani, nenmanathu parambil house, 2 c.j.mani (died) nenmanathu parambil house, chelakkaragramam, chelakkara p.o., thrissur district - 680 586. 3 thankamani w/o.late c.j.mani, nenmanathu parambil house, -2- 4 girija 5 geetha 6 sheeja r1, r3-6 by adv. sri.shammi vijayan r1, r3-6 by adv. sri.ayyappan sankar this op (family court) having been finally heard on 26.09.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: -3-j u d g m e n tk.harilal, j.this o.p.(fc) has been filed seeking a direction to the family court, attingal, to consider and dispose i.a. no. 1398 of 2018 in i.a. no. 2228 of 2011 in o.p. no. 850 of 2013 of the family court, attingal. going by ext.p3, we find that the family court has already disposed of the aforesaid i.a. thus, the relief sought for has become infructuous. hence, this o.p.(fc) would stand dismissed. we make it clear that if the petitioner does not intend to proceed with any of the reliefs in o.p.no.850 of 2013, he -4- is at liberty to file a memo to that effect and this order will not stand in the way of such an application.sd/- k.harilal judge sd/- shircy v. ds 26.09.2019' judge -5- appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of the petition in op(hma) before the family court, nedumangad) dated 17/06/2010. exhibit p2 true copy of the application in i.a.no.2228/2011 dated 15/11/2011. exhibit p3 true copy of the common order in i.a.nos.1051/2018, 1058/2018, 1398/2018 and 1399/2018 in o.p.no.850/2013 dated

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019 / 4TH ASWINA, 1941 OP (FC).No.54 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPHMA 831/2010 DATED 17-06- 2010 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD PETITIONER/PETITIONER: PREETHI, AGED 38 YEARS D/O.PEETHAMBARAN, HINDU, RESIDING AT P.S.NIVAS, PALAMKONAM, PERUMKULAM P.O., MANAMPOOR VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.S.SUDARSANA BABU RESPONDENT/COUNTER PETITIONER:

1 GIREESHMANI S/O.LATE C.J.MANI, NENMANATHU PARAMBIL HOUSE, 2 C.J.MANI (DIED) NENMANATHU PARAMBIL HOUSE, CHELAKKARAGRAMAM, CHELAKKARA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 586. 3 THANKAMANI W/O.LATE C.J.MANI, NENMANATHU PARAMBIL HOUSE, -2- 4 GIRIJA 5 GEETHA 6 SHEEJA R1, R3-6 BY ADV. SRI.SHAMMI VIJAYAN R1, R3-6 BY ADV. SRI.AYYAPPAN SANKAR THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26.09.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: -3-

J U D G M E N T

K.HARILAL, J.

This O.P.(FC) has been filed seeking a direction to the Family Court, Attingal, to consider and dispose I.A. No. 1398 of 2018 in I.A. NO. 2228 of 2011 in O.P. No. 850 of 2013 of the Family Court, Attingal. Going by Ext.P3, we find that the Family Court has already disposed of the aforesaid I.A. Thus, the relief sought for has become infructuous. Hence, this O.P.(FC) would stand dismissed. We make it clear that if the petitioner does not intend to proceed with any of the reliefs in O.P.No.850 of 2013, he -4- is at liberty to file a memo to that effect and this order will not stand in the way of such an application.

Sd/- K.HARILAL JUDGE Sd/- SHIRCY V. Ds 26.09.2019' JUDGE -5- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN OP(HMA) BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD) DATED 17/06/2010. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN I.A.NO.2228/2011 DATED 15/11/2011. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER IN I.A.NOS.1051/2018, 1058/2018, 1398/2018 AND 1399/2018 IN O.P.NO.850/2013 DATED

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial