Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jithin vs State of Kerala

Jithin vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 25, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1850895

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./214/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jithin

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sunil thomas friday ,the 25th day of january 2019 / 5th magha, 1940 bail appl..no. 214 of 2019 petitioner/accused: jithin aged 31 years s/o. jayan, kaithakkattu house, erisserypalam, kodungallur, thrissur. by advs. sri.s.rajeev sri.d.feroze sri.k.anand (a-1921) sri.k.k.dheerendrakrishnan sri.v.vinay respondent/state: 1 state of kerala (crime no. unknown of cherpulassery police station, palakkad district). 2 state of kerala, (crime no. unknown of ottappalam police station, palakkad district) other present: sr.pp c.k sureshthis bail application having come up for admission on 25.01.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a.214/19orderpetitioner herein, apprehending arrest, seeks pre-arrest bail.2. when the matter was taken up, learned public prosecutor, oninstructions, submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as an accused in crime no.18 of 2019 of cherpulassery police station on an allegation that, he had printed, manufactured and transacted counterfeit currency notes. according to the prosecution, he is the prime accused and investigation is progressing.3. considering the nature of allegation, i feel that, this is not a fit case in which the benefit of pre-arrest bail can be granted. bail application fails and is dismissed. sd/- sunil thomas judge sbna

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS FRIDAY ,THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 5TH MAGHA, 1940 Bail Appl..No. 214 of 2019 PETITIONER/ACCUSED: JITHIN AGED 31 YEARS S/O. JAYAN, KAITHAKKATTU HOUSE, ERISSERYPALAM, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR. BY ADVS. SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.D.FEROZE SRI.K.ANAND (A-1921) SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN SRI.V.VINAY RESPONDENT/STATE: 1 STATE OF KERALA (CRIME NO. UNKNOWN OF CHERPULASSERY POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT). 2 STATE OF KERALA, (CRIME NO. UNKNOWN OF OTTAPPALAM POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT) OTHER PRESENT: SR.PP C.K SURESH

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.214/19

ORDER

Petitioner herein, apprehending arrest, seeks pre-arrest bail.

2. When the matter was taken up, learned Public Prosecutor, on

instructions, submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as an accused in Crime No.18 of 2019 of Cherpulassery Police Station on an allegation that, he had printed, manufactured and transacted counterfeit currency notes. According to the prosecution, he is the prime accused and investigation is progressing.

3. Considering the nature of allegation, I feel that, this is not a fit case in which the benefit of pre-arrest bail can be granted. Bail application fails and is dismissed. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS JUDGE Sbna

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial