Rajamony vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 14, 2019

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1850883

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1850883
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice a.M.Babu
Decided On: Jan 14, 2019
Case Number: Bail Appl./2391/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajamony

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.m.babu monday ,the 14th day of january 2019 / 24th pousha, 1940 bail appl..no. 2391 of 2018 crime no. 55/2018 of kayamkulam excise range office , alappuzha petitioner/accused rajamony aged 55 years, w/o.soman, remya bhavanam, kandalloor, karthikappally taluk, alappuzha. by advs. sri.r.sunil kumar smt.a.salini lal respondent/de-facto complainant state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala at ernakualam through excise inspector, kayamkulam - 689 103 other present: p.p- smt. k.k .sheeba this bail application having come up for admission on 14.01.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a.2391/2018orderthis case was called during the morning session at 11.35 am and 12.05 pm. there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. even when the case is called now at 3.35 pm, there is no representation. the learned public prosecutor is present. it appears that the non- representation is either because the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter or because the application has become infructuous. the application is dismissed for non-prosecution. mrcs/14.1.19 true copy p.s.to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BABU MONDAY ,THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 24TH POUSHA, 1940 Bail Appl..No. 2391 of 2018 CRIME NO. 55/2018 OF Kayamkulam Excise Range Office , Alappuzha PETITIONER/ACCUSED RAJAMONY AGED 55 YEARS, W/O.SOMAN, REMYA BHAVANAM, KANDALLOOR, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKUALAM THROUGH EXCISE INSPECTOR, KAYAMKULAM - 689 103 OTHER PRESENT: P.P- SMT. K.K .SHEEBA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.2391/2018

ORDER

This case was called during the morning session at 11.35 am and 12.05 pm. There was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even when the case is called now at 3.35 pm, there is no representation. The learned public prosecutor is present. It appears that the non- representation is either because the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter or because the application has become infructuous. The application is dismissed for non-prosecution. Mrcs/14.1.19 True copy P.S.To Judge

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2019 Same Parties Rajamony vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice a.M.Babu