Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Maruthi vs the State of Karnataka

Maruthi vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 26, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1850348

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/200545/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Maruthi

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka, kalaburagi bench dated this the 26th day of july, 2024 before the hon'ble mr. justice c m joshi criminal petition no. 200545 of 2024 between: maruthi, s/o yellappa ravange, aged about 60 years, occ: coolie, r/of village malegaon, tq. & dist. bidar-585 403.…petitioner (by sri sharanabasappa k babshetty, advocate) and: the state of karnataka, digitally through bidar new town signed by police station, bidar, nandini r rep. by addl. state public prosecutor, location: high court of high court of karnataka, karnataka kalaburagi bench-585 107. …respondent (by smt. anitha.m reddy, hcgp)this crl.p. is filed u/s. 439 of cr.p.c to release the petitioner/accused no.2 on bail in crime no. offences punishable u/sec. 120(b), 302 and 201 r/w sec. 34 of ipc, now s.c no.150/2023, pending before the principal district and sessions judge, at bidar, in the interest of justice and equity. -2- this petition coming on for orders this daythrough video conferencing at bengaluru, orderwas made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice c m joshioral order(per: hon'ble mr. justice c m joshi) heard the learned counsel appearing for petitioner and learned hcgp appearing for respondent-state at some length.2. learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition after the material witnesses in the sessions case no.150/2023 are examined before the trial court.3. therefore, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after material witnesses are examined. sd/- (c m joshi) judge tsn*sl no.: 3

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200545 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MARUTHI, S/O YELLAPPA RAVANGE, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, R/OF VILLAGE MALEGAON, TQ. & DIST. BIDAR-585 403.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI SHARANABASAPPA K BABSHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, Digitally THROUGH BIDAR NEW TOWN signed by POLICE STATION, BIDAR, NANDINI R REP. BY ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Location: High Court of HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, Karnataka KALABURAGI BENCH-585 107. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. ANITHA.M REDDY, HCGP)

THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S. 439 OF CR.P.C TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 ON BAIL IN CRIME NO. OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 120(B), 302 AND 201 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC, NOW S.C NO.150/2023, PENDING BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BIDAR, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. -2- THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY

THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING AT BENGALURU, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) Heard the learned counsel appearing for petitioner and learned HCGP appearing for respondent-State at some length.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition after the material witnesses in the Sessions Case No.150/2023 are examined before the trial Court.

3. Therefore, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after material witnesses are examined. Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE tsn*Sl No.: 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial