Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Echjay Indus.

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Echjay Indus.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jun 19, 2000
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/18499

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Echjay Indus.

Legal References

Reported In
(2000)(71)ECC169

Excerpt

2. in this case the tribunal by the impugned order has held that the assessee was entitled to modvat credit which was taken on the basis of the certificate issued by consignment agents of tisco. the tribunal has passed the impugned order on the basis of the board circular as well as the judgment of the tribunal in the case of hero cycles ltd. v.collector of central excise, chandigarh in the application before me. the department seeks to raise the following question of law in paragraph 8 of the e.a. 6 form-- whether sales challans issued by the consignment agent of m/s. tisco ltd. are at par with the sales challan.the department is seeking the reference of the said question on the basis of what is contained in paragraph 5 in sub-para (iv): the hon. tribunal has erred in relying upon the decision in the case of m/s hero cycles ltd. v. cce, chandigarh in so much as the tribunal has been directed to frame a question of law by the high court of punjab and harayana vide its order dated 19th april, 1996 in central excise and salt act, 1944 case no. 2 of 1995.the question raised in our view is devoid of any particulars namely we do not know what is the question sought to referred in the said order of the high court of punjab and haryana which was not cited when the impugned order was passed. i am therefore constrained to dismiss the instant application as devoid of meirts.

Full Judgment

2. In this case the Tribunal by the impugned order has held that the assessee was entitled to Modvat credit which was taken on the basis of the certificate issued by consignment agents of TISCO. The Tribunal has passed the impugned order on the basis of the Board Circular as well as the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Hero Cycles Ltd. v.Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh in the application before me. The department seeks to raise the following question of law in paragraph 8 of the E.A. 6 Form-- Whether sales challans issued by the consignment agent of M/s. TISCO Ltd. are at par with the sales challan.

The department is seeking the reference of the said question on the basis of what is contained in paragraph 5 in sub-para (iv): The Hon. Tribunal has erred in relying upon the decision in the case of M/s Hero Cycles Ltd. v. CCE, Chandigarh in so much as the Tribunal has been directed to frame a question of law by the High Court of Punjab and Harayana vide its order dated 19th April, 1996 in Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 case No. 2 of 1995.

The question raised in our view is devoid of any particulars namely we do not know what is the question sought to referred in the said order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana which was not cited when the impugned order was passed. I am therefore constrained to dismiss the instant application as devoid of meirts.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial