Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nishad vs State of Kerala

Nishad vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 09, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1849811

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1785/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nishad

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sunil thomas wednesday,the 09th day of january 2019 / 19th pousha, 1940 petitioner/s: 1 nishad aged 42 years, s/o noohukunju, residing at house no. 20, sheeja manzil, manacadu nagen, now residing at 2 sheeja aged 40 years, w/o nishad., residing at house no. 20, sheeja manzil, manacadu nagen, now residing at 3 noohukunju aged 68 years, s/o yousuf kunju, residing at house no. 20, sheeja manzil, manacadu nagen, now residing at chirayil vadakkathil, krishna puram, ochira.by adv. sri.renjit george respondents/state & complainant: 1 state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam 682031. 2 the sub inspector of police eravipuram, kollam 691004. other present: sr.pp c.n prabhakaran this bail application having come up for admission on 09.01.2019, the court on the same day passed the following:o r d e rthe learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is some mistake in the bail application. he seeks permission to withdraw the bail application. permitted without prejudice to his right to file proper application. sd/- sunil thomas shg judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS WEDNESDAY,THE 09TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 19TH POUSHA, 1940 PETITIONER/S: 1 NISHAD AGED 42 YEARS, S/O NOOHUKUNJU, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 20, SHEEJA MANZIL, MANACADU NAGEN, NOW RESIDING AT 2 SHEEJA AGED 40 YEARS, W/O NISHAD., RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 20, SHEEJA MANZIL, MANACADU NAGEN, NOW RESIDING AT 3 NOOHUKUNJU AGED 68 YEARS, S/O YOUSUF KUNJU, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 20, SHEEJA MANZIL, MANACADU NAGEN, NOW RESIDING AT CHIRAYIL VADAKKATHIL, KRISHNA PURAM, OCHIRA.

BY ADV. SRI.RENJIT GEORGE RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682031. 2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERAVIPURAM, KOLLAM 691004. OTHER PRESENT: SR.PP C.N PRABHAKARAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is some mistake in the bail application. He seeks permission to withdraw the bail application. Permitted without prejudice to his right to file proper application. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS shg JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial