The Secretary, vs the Labour Inspector,

The Secretary, vs The Labour Inspector,

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 30, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1848895

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1848895
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Ravi V.Hosmani
Decided On: Jul 30, 2024
Case Number: WP/68628/2010

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Secretary,

Respondent

The Labour Inspector,

Excerpt

..... 4. appasaheb babu patil, 5. anand dadu kamble,-2-6. kakaso babu kadapure,7. sunil mahadev muragude,8. sharatkumar balu kanade, age: major, occ: service, all are resident of chikalawal, tal: chikodi, dist: belagavi. …respondents (by sri p.n.hatti, hcgp for r1; notice to r3 and r6 are served; r2, r4, r5, r7 and r8 - petition is dismissed) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of constitution of india praying to, issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ quashing theorder dated 02/09/2009 in no.wca-sr-150/2008-09passed by the labour commissioner, belagavi, as per annexure-f and etc., this writ petition, coming on for preliminary hearing - b group, this day, the court made therein as under: -3- coram: the hon'ble mr. justice ravi v.hosmanioral order(per: the hon'ble mr. justice ravi v.hosmani) perusal of order sheet would indicate that there is continuous absence of petitioner. as per order dated21.06.2021, court notice was issued to petitioner. petitioner is served. despite lapse of more than two years no steps are taken for engaging any other counsel. it is also seen that petition was dismissed as against respondents no.2, 4, 5, 7 and 8 on application for impleading filed by petitioner gram panchayath, for having left out necessary parties.as such petition would not survive and stands dismissed. sd/- judge em/ct-asc list no.: 1 sl no.: 53

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO.68628 OF 2010(L-MW) BETWEEN: THE SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT, CHIKODI, TQ: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (COURT NOTICE REPORT AS PETITIONER - SUFFICIENT) AND: Digitally signed by 1. THE LABOUR INSPECTOR, CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI CHIKODI CIRCLE, CHIKODI, Location: High
Court of Karnataka         DIST: BELAGAVI.
                      2.   SUNIL ANNASO PATIL,
                      3.   VASANT SHIAPPA SATALE,
                      4.   APPASAHEB BABU PATIL,
                      5.   ANAND DADU KAMBLE,
-2-
6. KAKASO BABU KADAPURE,
7. SUNIL MAHADEV MURAGUDE,
8. SHARATKUMAR BALU KANADE, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: SERVICE, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF CHIKALAWAL, TAL: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI P.N.HATTI, HCGP FOR R1; NOTICE TO R3 AND R6 ARE SERVED; R2, R4, R5, R7 AND R8 - PETITION IS DISMISSED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT QUASHING THE

ORDER DATED 02/09/2009 IN NO.WCA-SR-150/2008-09

PASSED BY THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI, AS PER ANNEXURE-F AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: -3- CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI) Perusal of order sheet would indicate that there is continuous absence of petitioner. As per order dated

21.06.2021, Court notice was issued to petitioner. Petitioner is served. Despite lapse of more than two years no steps are taken for engaging any other counsel. It is also seen that petition was dismissed as against respondents no.2, 4, 5, 7 and 8 on application for impleading filed by petitioner Gram Panchayath, for having left out necessary parties.

As such petition would not survive and stands dismissed. SD/- JUDGE EM/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties The Secretary, vs The Labour Inspector, Same Judge Ravi V.Hosmani