Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajesh vs State of Kerala

Rajesh vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 28, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1848808

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/128/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajesh

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice raja vijayaraghavan v thursday, the 28th day of february 2019 / 9th phalguna, 1940 crime no. 852/2018 of perumpetty police station, pathanamthitta petitioner/accused: rajesh, aged 44 years, thankappan nair, edaparambil malathil house, ayiroor north, newzhoor muri, ayiroor, perumpetty, pathanamthitta district. by adv. sri.k.b.arunkumar respondents/state: 1 state of kerala, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, pin-682031. 2 the circle inspector of police, perumpetty police station, perumpetty, pathanamthitta district, pin- 686547. by sr. public prosecutor sri. amjad ali this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 28.02.2019, the court on the same day passed the following:orderthis petition is filed under section 482 of the cr.p.c.2. the petitioner herein is the accused in crime no. 852 of2018 of the perumpetty police station registered under section 376 of the ipc and under section 3 r/w. section 4 of the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012.3. when the matter was taken up for hearing today, thelearned public prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the wife of the petitioner has resiled from her earlier version. it is submitted that on investigation, the allegations were found to be not true. the investigating officer is on the verge of referring the case as false. the said submission is recorded and this petition is closed.the right of the petitioner to move the jurisdictional court for appropriate relief, if so warranted, at a later stage is reserved. sd/- raja vijayaraghavan v., judge avs appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: annexure 1 the certified copy of the fir in crime no.852/2018 of perumpetty police station. respondent's/s exhibits: nil avs //true copy// p.a to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1940 CRIME NO. 852/2018 OF PERUMPETTY POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA PETITIONER/ACCUSED: RAJESH, AGED 44 YEARS, THANKAPPAN NAIR, EDAPARAMBIL MALATHIL HOUSE, AYIROOR NORTH, NEWZHOOR MURI, AYIROOR, PERUMPETTY, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR RESPONDENTS/STATE: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682031. 2 THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMPETTY POLICE STATION, PERUMPETTY, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN- 686547. BY SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. AMJAD ALI THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.

2. The petitioner herein is the accused in Crime No. 852 of

2018 of the Perumpetty Police Station registered under Section 376 of the IPC and under Section 3 r/w. Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the

learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the wife of the petitioner has resiled from her earlier version. It is submitted that on investigation, the allegations were found to be not true. The investigating officer is on the verge of referring the case as false. The said submission is recorded and this petition is closed.

The right of the petitioner to move the jurisdictional court for appropriate relief, if so warranted, at a later stage is reserved. Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., JUDGE avs APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE 1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.852/2018 OF PERUMPETTY POLICE STATION. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL avs //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial