Nithin, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 14, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1848741

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1848741
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Sunil Thomas
Decided On: Jan 14, 2019
Case Number: Bail Appl./116/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nithin,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sunil thomas monday ,the 14th day of january 2019 / 24th pousha, 1940 bail appl..no. 116 of 2019 crime no. 676/2018 of ottapalam police station , palakkad applicants/accused nos.a1, a2 and a5: 1 nithin, s/o anilkumar, dwaraka nivas, govindapuram p.o., mankavu, kozhikode. 2 santhosh, s/o selvaraj, lakshmi nivas, kavil kottamparambu, govindapuram p.o., near valayanad temple, mankavu, kozhikode. 3 manu, aged 31 years s/o madhu, mammiliparambu house, kommeri p.o., mankavu, kozhikode. by adv. sri.v.a.johnson (varikkappallil) respondent/complainant: state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682031. other present: pp ajith murali this bail application having come up for admission on 14.01.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a.116/19orderpetitioners are accused no.1, 2 and 5 in crime no.676 of 2018 of ottapalam police station for offence punishable under section 21(c) r/w 29 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act.2. the allegation of the prosecution is that, on 23.08.2018 at7.30p.m., accused were found in possession of commercial quantity of psychotropic substances. they were intercepted, samples taken and thereafter arrested. they are in custody since 23.08.2018. they seek bail.3. it seems that the commercial quantity was recovered from the accused. the earlier bail application filed by them as b.a.no.8295 of 2018 was dismissed by this court by order dated 11.12.2018 taking note of the fact that the quantity involved is a commercial quantity. there seems to be no substantial change of circumstance now warranting granting of bail now. bail application fails and is dismissed. sd/- sunil thomas judge sbna/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MONDAY ,THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 24TH POUSHA, 1940 Bail Appl..No. 116 of 2019 CRIME NO. 676/2018 OF Ottapalam Police Station , Palakkad APPLICANTS/ACCUSED NOS.A1, A2 AND A5: 1 NITHIN, S/O ANILKUMAR, DWARAKA NIVAS, GOVINDAPURAM P.O., MANKAVU, KOZHIKODE. 2 SANTHOSH, S/O SELVARAJ, LAKSHMI NIVAS, KAVIL KOTTAMPARAMBU, GOVINDAPURAM P.O., NEAR VALAYANAD TEMPLE, MANKAVU, KOZHIKODE. 3 MANU, AGED 31 YEARS S/O MADHU, MAMMILIPARAMBU HOUSE, KOMMERI P.O., MANKAVU, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031. OTHER PRESENT: PP AJITH MURALI THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.116/19

ORDER

Petitioners are accused No.1, 2 and 5 in Crime No.676 of 2018 of Ottapalam Police Station for offence punishable under section 21(c) r/w 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

2. The allegation of the prosecution is that, on 23.08.2018 at

7.30p.m., accused were found in possession of commercial quantity of psychotropic substances. They were intercepted, samples taken and thereafter arrested. They are in custody since 23.08.2018. They seek bail.

3. It seems that the commercial quantity was recovered from the accused. The earlier bail application filed by them as B.A.No.8295 of 2018 was dismissed by this Court by order dated 11.12.2018 taking note of the fact that the quantity involved is a commercial quantity. There seems to be no substantial change of circumstance now warranting granting of bail now. Bail application fails and is dismissed. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS JUDGE Sbna/

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2019 Same Parties Nithin, vs State of Kerala, Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Sunil Thomas