Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sheeba Davis vs the State of Kerala

Sheeba Davis vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 18, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1847821

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WA/19/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sheeba Davis

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable the chief justice mr.hrishikesh roy & the honourable mr. justice a.k.jayasankaran nambiar friday ,the 18th day of january 2019 / 28th pousha, 1940 wa.no. 19 of 2019 against the judgment in wp(c) 9113/2016 dtd 7.9.2018 appellant/petitioner: sheeba davis, aged 44 years w/o. davis, kachapilly house, angamaly p.o, chempanoor north, erenakulam district 683572. by adv. sri.g.sreekumar (chelur) sri.sreevisakh respondentss/respondents 1 to 3: 1 the state of kerala rep. by the secretary to the government, local self government department, government secretariat, thiruvannathapuram 695 001. 2 the mala grama panchayath rep. by its secretary, mala p.o, thrissur 680 732. 3 the secretary. mala grama panchayath, mala p.o, thrissur 680 732. r2, r3 by adv. sri.philip t.varghese, sc, r1 by govt pleader sri.tek chand this writ appeal having come up for admission on 18.01.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: wa.19/19judgmenthrishikesh roy, c.j.the learned counsel sri.sreevisakh, after some deliberations in the matter, prays for the liberty to withdraw the writ appeal so that the appellant can explore the possibility of raising her claim before the appropriate forum, as has been permitted by the learned single judge. in view of such submission made by the appellant's lawyer, the case is dismissed as not pressed, reserving the liberty as aforesaid. the presence of the government pleader sri.tek chand for the 1 st respondent and sri.philip t. varghese as the counsel appearing for the mala grama panchayat (respondent nos.2 and 3) are noted, for the purpose of record. hrishikesh roy chief justicea.k.jayasankaran nambiar judge kkb. /true copy/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.HRISHIKESH ROY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 28TH POUSHA, 1940 WA.No. 19 of 2019 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 9113/2016 DTD 7.9.2018 APPELLANT/PETITIONER: SHEEBA DAVIS, AGED 44 YEARS W/O. DAVIS, KACHAPILLY HOUSE, ANGAMALY P.O, CHEMPANOOR NORTH, ERENAKULAM DISTRICT 683572. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.SREEVISAKH RESPONDENTSS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANNATHAPURAM 695 001. 2 THE MALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MALA P.O, THRISSUR 680 732. 3 THE SECRETARY. MALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MALA P.O, THRISSUR 680 732. R2, R3 BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE, SC, R1 BY GOVT PLEADER SRI.TEK CHAND THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: WA.19/19

JUDGMENT

Hrishikesh Roy, C.J.

The learned counsel Sri.Sreevisakh, after some deliberations in the matter, prays for the liberty to withdraw the Writ Appeal so that the appellant can explore the possibility of raising her claim before the appropriate forum, as has been permitted by the learned single Judge. In view of such submission made by the appellant's lawyer, the case is dismissed as not pressed, reserving the liberty as aforesaid. The presence of the Government Pleader Sri.Tek Chand for the 1 st respondent and Sri.Philip T. Varghese as the counsel appearing for the Mala Grama Panchayat (respondent Nos.2 and 3) are noted, for the purpose of record. HRISHIKESH ROY CHIEF JUSTICE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE kkb. /True copy/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial